Normal Mills Accused Of Labeling Tulsa Bloodbath As ‘Enjoyable Truth’

[ad_1] by Sharelle B. McNair July 2, 2025

There was nothing enjoyable concerning the Tulsa Race Bloodbath, labeled as one of many single worst incidents of racial violence in American historical past.

A lawsuit accuses meals producer Normal Mills of retaliating in opposition to a former worker after reporting alleged “enjoyable details” throughout Black Historical past Month, referencing delicate historic occasions together with the Tulsa Bloodbath and Black Codes, Fox 9 Information reported.

The discrimination and retaliation lawsuit was filed by Storms Dworak LLC on behalf of L. Lee Tyus Jr., a Black man, who alleges the corporate violated the Minnesota Human Rights Act when he was terminated for talking up. The Minnesota-based firm allegedly handed out flyers throughout the February 2025 celebration, labeling violent acts of historical past just like the Tulsa Race Bloodbath as “Enjoyable Info.”

After expressing concern, he was positioned on involuntary depart. Upon his return, Tyus shared contact info of different workers who claimed to be offended by the content material. After copies of the doc he created had been positioned within the breakroom, the litigation alleges he was escorted out and fired.

The $50,000 lawsuit pushes for a civil high quality and legal professional charges, as, in keeping with KARE 11, Tyus began working at Normal Mills in 2019. In January 2025, he obtained a efficiency assessment stating he was “on monitor.”

There was nothing enjoyable concerning the Tulsa Race Bloodbath, often known as the Black Wall Road Bloodbath. Labeled as one of many single worst incidents of racial violence in American historical past, the occasion lasted for 18 hours on Might 31 and June 1, 1921, leading to an estimated 300 Black People being killed. As well as, a white mob destroyed over 1,000 houses and companies, burning Oklahoma’s second-largest African-American group to the bottom.

As soon as the violence ended, the town was positioned below martial legislation.

Surviving Tulsa residents have been combating for justice and restitution for many years. In 2024, the Oklahoma Supreme Courtroom denied a request to rethink a ruling that after dismissed a lawsuit filed by the final two recognized residing survivors. The swimsuit was an effort to power the town of Tulsa and others to make restitution for the destruction below the state’s public nuisance legislation. Authorized reps additionally argued that the town appropriated Black Wall Road’s iconic status for its “monetary and reputational profit.”

In a press release, Tyus’s lawyer, Naomi Martin, mentioned the lawsuit was filed as a result of individuals shouldn't be focused for standing up for what they imagine. “Normal Mills has a nationwide model and a deep Minnesota footprint. In my opinion, that type of presence comes with duty, and an organization of this dimension ought to be modeling what it means to help workers who communicate up, not firing them. Mr. Tyus did what each worker ought to really feel secure to do — he stood up, spoke out in opposition to what he believed was discrimination, and reported it. That took braveness,” Martin mentioned.

“And it’s precisely the type of motion the Minnesota Human Rights Act exists to guard. We introduced this case as a result of nobody ought to face retaliation for doing the appropriate factor.”