With its ruling within the automobile finance case, the UK supreme courtroom despatched a transparent message: some motorists bought automobiles with offers that have been certainly unfair, but it surely’s not the judiciary’s job to redraw the boundaries of client safety regulation. That burden, the justices steered, rests with regulators and elected governments. This reasoning is according to a significant speech in June by the courtroom’s president, Lord Reed, who argued that judges aren’t policymakers – and shouldn’t be. He led a bench that nonetheless upheld a discovering of unfairness within the case of the manufacturing unit supervisor Marcus Johnson. The courtroom flagged the hazard, outlined the brink – however stopped wanting imposing redress itself.
Support Greater and Subscribe to view content
This is premium stuff. Subscribe to read the entire article.
