Ecosia has provided to take ‘stewardship’ of Chrome. And it isn't a nasty concept.

[ad_1] “It’s not absurd, proper?” Christian Kroll, CEO of Berlin-based non-profit search engine Ecosia, says of his firm’s unsolicited request to be granted a 10-year “stewardship” of Google’s Chrome browser, as a substitute of forcing Google to promote it to a competitor.

His concept is most positively absurd, but additionally intelligent.

On Thursday, Ecosia introduced it had despatched a proposal relating to Chrome to Google and to U.S. Choose Mehta. The decide is anticipated to rule this month on treatments to his 2024 landmark determination that Google has an unlawful monopoly in web search and promoting.

One of many treatments the Division of Justice requested for would pressure Google to divest itself from Chrome. Google has not agreed to take action (and in 2024 vowed to enchantment the unique ruling). Nonetheless, rivals have been lining as much as purchase Chrome ever since. Each OpenAI and Perplexity have mentioned they’d purchase it; final week Perplexity even made an unsolicited $34.5 billion money supply.

Perplexity’s supply was extensively panned as being too low (to not point out, billions greater than Perplexity has raised so far). “We’d assume OpenAI probably could be ready to pay considerably extra for it,” speculated RBC analyst Brad Erickson in a analysis word.

Ecosia believes Chrome is on monitor to generate $1 trillion over the following decade and an public sale might value it “within the tons of of billions,” he mentioned.

Which is why, on face worth, Ecosia asking to be handed Chrome without cost – together with management of about 60% of the income generated by its customers – appears absurd.

Techcrunch occasion

San Francisco | October 27-29, 2025

The proposal guarantees to spend these billions on local weather tasks, as is Ecosia’s basic mission. Based in 2009, the non-profit donates thousands and thousands per thirty days and has relationships with native communities and NGOs in over 35 international locations. It has specified tasks on this Chrome proposal, together with defending rainforests, international tree-planting and agroforestry, prosecuting polluters, and investing in inexperienced AI tech.

The remaining 40% ($400 billion, Ecosia says, based mostly on that $1 trillion estimate) could be paid to Google. Google would keep mental property possession, and might even proceed to be the default search engine. When the last decade is up, stewardship might be handed to a different, or in any other case reviewed.

Ecosia, which makes use of Google to energy its search engine, already has a revenue-share partnership with the tech large. And it already presents its personal browser constructed on the Chromium open supply engine that powers Chrome. That’s why he thinks the stewardship concept isn’t so out-of-line. “We might be blissful to handle Chrome for them,” Kroll says. Ecosia is even providing to take care of employment for the Chrome workers.

Nonetheless, Kroll admits the larger aim is to get the decide to contemplate options to the everyday divesture choices of promoting or spinning off. These choices would merely maintain Chrome’s energy, and its billions, within the pockets of massive tech.

“We maintain a monitor document of constructing unattainable issues doable,” he says. Ought to he get the decide considering, “who is aware of what may come out of it?”