SCOTUS declines to listen to Alex Jones’ enchantment in Sandy Hook lawsuit – One America Information Community

[ad_1] <img decoding="async" width="800" height="534" src="https://www.oann.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/FOR-WEBSITE-ARTICLES-2025-10-14T150556.109.png" alt="" class="wp-image-727477" srcset="https://www.oann.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/FOR-WEBSITE-ARTICLES-2025-10-14T150556.109.png 800w, https://www.oann.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/FOR-WEBSITE-ARTICLES-2025-10-14T150556.109-400x267.png 400w, https://www.oann.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/FOR-WEBSITE-ARTICLES-2025-10-14T150556.109-768x513.png 768w" sizes="(max-width: 800px) 100vw, 800px"/> (Picture through: screenshot taken of clip posted by @RealAlexJones X account)

OAN Employees Brooke Mallory3:33 PM – Tuesday, October 14, 2025

The Supreme Court docket on Tuesday declined to listen to Infowars founder and host Alex Jones’ enchantment of an roughly $1.4 billion defamation judgment, stemming from prior claims referring to the 2012 Sandy Hook Elementary Faculty capturing being “staged.”

The choice successfully leaves intact one of many largest defamation awards in U.S. historical past.

“The Plaintiffs listed here are on the other aspect of the ideological spectrum and are not looking for cash for his or her judgment,” Jones’s legal professionals wrote to the justices. “Their preliminary motivations had been to get Jones’s message off the air. However after entry of the devastating, report breaking $1,436,650,000 judgment, that motivation morphed to one thing extra sinister.”

Jones beforehand theorized that the 2012 Sandy Hook capturing, wherein 20 youngsters and 6 educators had been killed by gunman Adam Lanza at a college in Newtown, Connecticut, was a “false flag” operation staged by the U.S. authorities to additional promote gun management measures. On the time, Jones described the capturing as “manufactured” and “an enormous hoax.”

A false flag is a covert act or operation designed to mislead the general public by attributing blame to an opponent or authority, usually to justify conflict, affect laws, or sway public opinion.

Commercial

The unique lawsuit, filed by 14 relations of the victims and a former FBI agent who responded to the scene, accused Jones of spreading lies that prompted immense emotional misery.

Within the 2022 defamation trial, FBI Particular Agent William Aldenberg was among the many plaintiffs within the lawsuit in opposition to Jones and the primary witness on the stand. As a primary responder to the scene, Aldenberg testified about witnessing the aftermath and his testimony was central to the case’s ruling, plaintiffs’ attorneys emphasised.

A Connecticut jury later discovered Jones liable, awarding $965 million in compensatory damages and $474 million in punitive damages. Aldenberg was additionally awarded roughly $90 million as his share of the $1.4 billion.

When it comes to latest developments, in September, Ed Martin Jr.— U.S. Pardon Legal professional and Director of the Weaponization Working Group — despatched a letter to Aldenberg’s legal professional questioning if he acquired any “monetary advantages” from “organizing” the lawsuit or if his FBI function created conflicts, suggesting potential violations of federal ethics legal guidelines.

Nevertheless, Deputy Legal professional Normal Todd Blanche later directed Martin to withdraw the inquiry.

Jones has persistently argued that the judgment violates his constitutional rights to free speech and due course of, and he has additionally contended that the dimensions of the award is extreme and pointless. Nevertheless, regardless of Jones’ assertions, the Supreme Court docket’s refusal to listen to the enchantment seemingly ensures that he stays legally liable for paying the complete quantity — regardless of submitting for chapter in December 2022.

Courts have since dominated that Jones can not “use chapter as a defend,” and efforts to liquidate property from his firm, Infowars, have confronted issues — together with a failed public sale. Asset liquidation is now being pursued in Texas, the place Jones is contesting the appointment of a court-appointed receiver.

Nonetheless, regardless of the authorized challenges, Jones has nonetheless maintained a public presence, having over 4.4 million followers on X. His social media account continues to submit media appearances and different on-line content material related to his model as a media persona. Nevertheless, with the continuing challenges and monetary obligations, it may later have an effect on his potential to function and produce content material on the scale beforehand related to Infowars.

“The Supreme Court docket correctly rejected Jones’s newest determined try to keep away from accountability for the hurt he has prompted. We look ahead to implementing the jury’s historic verdict and making Jones and Infowars pay for what they've performed,” Chris Mattei, an legal professional representing the households, stated in an announcement.

Alex Jones Completely Responds To Supreme Court docket Ruling That Judges – Not Juries – Can Discover Individuals Civilly Liable For Billions, Silence & Shut Them Down! Plus, Declassified Docs Show Obama Commanded The Unlawful Witchhunts Towards The American Folks! https://t.co/7TNExZesxq