G20 summit closes in South Africa after U.S. absence : NPR

[ad_1] <img src="https://npr.brightspotcdn.com/dims3/default/strip/false/crop/7597x5065+0+0/resize/1100/quality/50/format/jpeg/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fnpr-brightspot.s3.amazonaws.com%2F93%2Fd3%2F897834744d99a05a88dee8494615%2Fap25326479896147.jpg" data-template="https://npr.brightspotcdn.com/dims3/default/strip/false/crop/7597x5065+0+0/resize/{width}/quality/{quality}/format/{format}/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fnpr-brightspot.s3.amazonaws.com%2F93%2Fd3%2F897834744d99a05a88dee8494615%2Fap25326479896147.jpg" class="img" alt="Heads of states pose for a family photo following the first plenary session of the G20 leaders' summit in Johannesburg, South Africa, Saturday, Nov. 22, 2025. " fetchpriority="high"/> Heads of states pose for a household picture following the primary plenary session of the G20 leaders' summit in Johannesburg, South Africa, on Saturday. Misper Apawu/Pool AP conceal caption

toggle caption

Misper Apawu/Pool AP JOHANNESBURG, South Africa — This weekend's G20 Leaders' Summit in South Africa was uncommon for a number of causes. The primary summit on the African continent was additionally the primary time the U.S. had boycotted the summit of the world's largest economies.

It was additionally unprecedented in that the group of disparate nations agreed to a declaration on the assembly's begin relatively than its conclusion, and that there was no ceremonial handover between the outgoing and incoming G20 chairs.

The Trump administration boycotted the occasion after Trump falsely accused the South African authorities of confiscating white-owned land and permitting the killing of white Afrikaners. The U.S. additionally objected to what it thought of the summit's DEI — variety, fairness and inclusion — agenda.

Regardless of what some officers and analysts mentioned had been Washington's greatest makes an attempt to derail the occasion, South African Minister of Worldwide Relations Ronald Lamola was upbeat because it wrapped up on Sunday at a conference middle not removed from the well-known Johannesburg township of Soweto.

"In a nutshell … this has been an amazing success for our nation," mentioned Lamola.

Earlier Sunday, host President Cyril Ramaphosa had declared the assembly closed, banging a ceremonial gavel on the desk.

"This gavel of this G20 summit formally closes this summit and now strikes on to the following president of the G20, which is america, the place we will see one another once more subsequent 12 months," he mentioned.

Often he'd be anticipated at hand that gavel over to the chief of the nation taking on the rotating chairmanship of the G20, however President Trump was not in attendance. Washington had requested that Ramaphosa hand over to a junior embassy official, however the South Africans refused.

"I imply, it is a breach of protocol. It has by no means occurred earlier than and it was by no means going to occur for the primary time right here in South Africa," Ramaphosa's spokesperson, Vincent Magwenya, advised reporters.

The handover will now happen on Monday between South African and U.S. officers of comparable rank.

Joint declaration The U.S. had additionally advised the South Africans that they need to not difficulty a joint declaration on the summit's shut, and that in the event that they issued one thing it ought to solely be known as a "chair's assertion."

Nevertheless, Ramaphosa, who mentioned forward of the occasion "we won't be bullied," introduced on the assembly's opening on Saturday that consensus had been reached and a joint assertion was issued with out the enter of the U.S.

<img src="https://npr.brightspotcdn.com/dims3/default/strip/false/crop/6958x4639+0+0/resize/1100/quality/50/format/jpeg/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fnpr-brightspot.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fed%2F3d%2Ff1f90b80401c85dbf121c65cf589%2Fap25327467760853.jpg" data-template="https://npr.brightspotcdn.com/dims3/default/strip/false/crop/6958x4639+0+0/resize/{width}/quality/{quality}/format/{format}/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fnpr-brightspot.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fed%2F3d%2Ff1f90b80401c85dbf121c65cf589%2Fap25327467760853.jpg" class="img" alt="People walk by a large screen TV where South African President Cyril Ramaphosa holds a wooden gavel as he officially closes the G20 leaders' summit, in Johannesburg, South Africa, Sunday, Nov. 23, 2025." loading="lazy"/> Individuals stroll by a big display TV the place South African President Cyril Ramaphosa holds a wood gavel as he formally closes the G20 leaders' summit, in Johannesburg, South Africa, on Sunday. Jerome Delay/AP conceal caption

toggle caption

Jerome Delay/AP Whereas G20 declarations are usually not binding, White Home spokesperson Anna Kelly criticized the transfer, accusing Ramaphosa of "refusing to facilitate a clean transition of the G20 presidency" and mentioned Trump seemed ahead to "restoring legitimacy" to the group subsequent 12 months. He has mentioned he plans to carry the occasion in Florida.

The declaration contained the form of DEI language disliked by the Trump administration, stressing the specter of local weather change, the significance of reaching "gender equality" and the debt burden confronted by poorer nations.

Argentina — whose libertarian president, Javier Milei, is a robust Trump ally and didn't attend the summit in solidarity with Trump however despatched different illustration — voiced some objections to the language however in the end the declaration was nonetheless issued.

World leaders in attendance thanked South Africa for its G20 management, with French President Emmanuel Macron giving Ramaphosa a heat hug. However whereas Ramaphosa lauded the occasion as a win for multilateralism, Macron famous the divisions on the summit had been nonetheless obvious.

And whereas Ramaphosa mentioned South Africa had used the summit to place "the International South on the coronary heart of the agenda" and "prioritized the problems that matter most to growing economies," it was conflicts in different components of the world that dominated on the summit's sidelines.

European leaders put out an announcement elevating considerations in regards to the U.S.'s new peace plan for Ukraine, which some see as favoring Moscow, saying it wanted "further work" and including that proposed limitations on Ukraine's armed forces would go away Ukraine susceptible to future assault.