Congress passes $50 billion international support invoice : NPR

[ad_1] <img src="https://npr.brightspotcdn.com/dims3/default/strip/false/crop/7654x5103+0+0/resize/1100/quality/50/format/jpeg/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fnpr-brightspot.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fbe%2F6d%2Fac561ef4423a96cbc802a1fe6d70%2Fusaid-2253193345.jpg" data-template="https://npr.brightspotcdn.com/dims3/default/strip/false/crop/7654x5103+0+0/resize/{width}/quality/{quality}/format/{format}/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fnpr-brightspot.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fbe%2F6d%2Fac561ef4423a96cbc802a1fe6d70%2Fusaid-2253193345.jpg" class="img" alt="Remnants of signage for the US Agency for International Development (USAID) on the facade of the Ronald Reagan Building and International Trade Center building in Washington, DC, on December 29, 2025." fetchpriority="high"/> Remnants of signage for the US Company for Worldwide Improvement (USAID) on the facade of the Ronald Reagan Constructing and Worldwide Commerce Middle constructing in Washington, DC, on December 29, 2025. Brendan Smialowski/AFP/by way of Getty Photos conceal caption

toggle caption

Brendan Smialowski/AFP/by way of Getty Photos International support spending is again within the U.S. authorities's funds, after a yr by which the Trump administration minimize billions of {dollars} to international well being and humanitarian help.

On Tuesday night, President Trump signed the spending invoice that may fund a lot of the federal government by September 30.

In that laws, Congress has allotted $50 billion for international support in 2026 — a 16% minimize from 2025. Nonetheless, it is much more cash than the administration had signaled it desires to spend on international support in its proposed funds.

The international support package deal consists of funding for quite a lot of points, corresponding to army support to Egypt, Israel and Taiwan. Nonetheless, it additionally consists of cash for initiatives geared toward supporting democracy, scholarship packages, U.S. embassy operations and well being and humanitarian packages around the globe.

Susan Collins, R-Maine, chair of the Senate Appropriations Committee, mentioned in an announcement that the invoice advances the priorities of the American individuals. "This fiscally accountable package deal would realign U.S. international help and make America safer and stronger on the world stage."

Support teams additionally welcomed the package deal, at the same time as they famous the discount in funding for humanitarian help in comparison with earlier years.

"Robust, clear and efficient help helps to avoid wasting lives, forestall battle and displacement, and creates the situations for kids and households to construct safer, more healthy futures," mentioned Christy Gleason, Chief Coverage Officer for Save the Youngsters, in an announcement.

In 2025, the Trump administration dismantled a lot of America's international support methods, together with shutting down the 64-year-old United States Company for Worldwide Improvement, and despatched again billions of {dollars} that Congress had earmarked for international support in 2025. These strikes have been largely accepted by a Republican-led congress.

President Trump and different senior administration officers accused the company of being rife with waste and fraud and a bastion of the far left. However this invoice seems to sign a change of coronary heart in Congress, based on Jonathan Katz, a fellow on the Brookings Establishment and a USAID official in the course of the Obama administration and a part of Trump's first time period.

"The stunning issue is that you just see Congress, in a bipartisan trend, saying 'we need to fund international help,' from international well being to meals safety to even democracy assist, which has been a lot maligned by the Trump administration," he says.

Katz says there's been concern from either side of the aisle over how the discount in funding final yr impacted international well being and humanitarian support around the globe. Many individuals misplaced entry to clinics and drugs and meals. There's additionally the worry {that a} discount in American support may result in the U.S. shedding its tender energy affect around the globe and provides rivals — like China — a chance to fill the hole, he says.

Some Republicans nodded to these issues as they defined the objectives of the international support funding.

"We counter our foes and stand with our mates. And we reinforce democracy and human rights efforts. Targeted safety and financial investments hold People protected and preserve our international edge," wrote Tom Cole, R-Okla., in an announcement issued when the invoice first got here out.

"I believe there is a little bit of purchaser's regret in relation to U.S. engagement globally, that means the tender energy withdrawal of the USA that President Trump's insurance policies have been form of resulting in," Katz says.

However others within the international support neighborhood wished to see a Congress that is extra aligned with the administration's new mannequin for international support. The State Division's new America First World Well being Technique focuses on making one-on-one offers with particular person international locations, investing of their healthcare methods and requiring these governments to chip in, too, in addition to create alternatives for American companies.

Max Primorac, an analyst with the Heritage Basis who beforehand held senior roles at USAID, says Congress has allotted an excessive amount of total.

"It is at all times the issue of overfunding," Primorac says. "[Congress] does not appear to be conscious that we simply do not have cash to spend like we did earlier than."

Primorac says the package deal included some positives for supporters of the administration's views on international support — corresponding to the shortage of funding for packages that assist gender equality, LGBTQ points and local weather change and fewer funding total for United Nations businesses.

However he was stunned on the $9.4 billion allotted for international well being packages geared toward curbing ailments like HIV/Aids, malaria and addressing maternal and baby well being and different points. It is largely the identical stage of funding for international well being as earlier years, he says.

"It is an excessive amount of cash and retaining alive an business that has been residing off of the taxpayer cash for much too lengthy," Primorac says.

The Trump administration has been essential of support teams and NGOs who, within the earlier support mannequin, obtained the majority of international support funding to do international well being work. Primorac says they spend an excessive amount of on overhead prices fairly than the precise points. As an alternative, he says, the administration's new technique encourages self-sufficiency in low earnings international locations.

"My concern is that [this package] may really upend the reforms of this administration by creating disincentives for these African states to take extra monetary possession and due to this fact extra duty in the event that they see that this cash must be spent anyway," Primorac says.

Each Katz and Primorac agree that the passing of this package deal will not be the tip of the controversy between Congress and the White Home over international support.

"I believe we're prone to see an administration that continues to make selections about spending that it thinks needs to be the precedence versus that which Congress believes needs to be the precedence," Katz says.