People spend simply 10 % of their revenue on meals

[ad_1] Every little thing concerning the American financial system proper now feels bizarre. The hiring image is weird ; the stock market is weird ; and AI infusion into work is very, very weird .

However right here’s a quantity that, in case you assume laborious sufficient, is stranger — not less than traditionally — than all the remaining: 10.4 %.

That’s the share of their disposable revenue that People spent on meals in 2024, based on the USDA’s Economic Research Service . That’s groceries, eating places, even the occasional ill-advised 11 pm burrito supply. And all of it provides as much as a couple of dime of each greenback.

Which may sound like so much in case you’ve been watching your ever-growing grocery receipt recently or when the New York Instances is discovering People who apparently spend over a quarter of their income on DoorDash delivery . However let me put it in context.

In 1901, when the Bureau of Labor Statistics conducted its first major household expenditure survey , the typical American household spent 42.5 % of its funds on meals — not on meals and housing and all the pieces else, simply meals. At at this time’s median family revenue, that may be the equal of roughly $2,600 a month going to the grocery retailer. In 1947, People have been nonetheless spending 23 % of their revenue on groceries alone — and that was earlier than accounting for eating places. As not too long ago because the Sixties, the determine for all meals spending hovered around 15 percent .

The lengthy, quiet decline from 42 % to 10 % is likely one of the most consequential financial traits in American historical past, one which has as a lot to do with People getting richer because it has to do with the value of meals. However virtually no one talks about it.

The person who first seen this sample was a German statistician named Ernst Engel — and earlier than you ask, no, not the Engels with Marx and the Communist Manifesto. Ernst Engel was born in Dresden in 1821; Friedrich Engels was born in Barmen in 1820. (The overlap has been inflicting confusion in econ lecture rooms for over a century.)

In 1857, Ernst Engel analyzed roughly 200 working-class household budgets from Belgium and seen one thing hanging: Poor households spent 60 to 70 % of their revenue on meals, whereas wealthier households spent beneath 50 %. It appeared that the richer you bought, the smaller the share that went to consuming.

This grew to become often called Engel’s Law , and it stays one of the crucial sturdy empirical findings in all of economics — confirmed throughout international locations, centuries, and each dataset anybody has thrown at it.

The rationale Engel’s Regulation issues a lot is that meals spending as a share of revenue is, in impact, a freedom index. Meals comes first, and while you’re spending two-thirds of your paycheck simply to eat, there’s virtually nothing left for schooling, well being care, financial savings, recreation — all of the issues that make life greater than mere survival. As that share falls, the remainder of life can open up.

All this occurred not accidentally, however due to one of the crucial underappreciated revolutions in human historical past: the transformation of American agriculture.

In 1940, one American farmer fed about 19 folks. At this time, one farmer feeds practically 170 folks. That’s an almost nine-fold improve in productiveness in lower than a century. In 1850, the vast majority of American staff labored on farms — at this time, it’s under 2 percent . We produce vastly extra meals with vastly fewer folks on less land .

Take corn, the spine of the American meals system. From 1866 to 1936, corn yields were essentially flat at about 26 bushels per acre. Then got here hybrid corn, artificial fertilizer, mechanization, and trendy genetics. By 1950, yields had crept as much as 38 bushels per acre. At this time, they’re above 180 . That’s a sevenfold improve in what one acre of floor can produce.

The consequence? The USDA discovered that real retail food prices were actually 2 percent lower in 2019 than in 1980, even earlier than adjusting for the large enchancment in selection and high quality. People at this time have entry to meals from each continent, in each season, at costs that may have baffled their grandparents.

And it’s not simply an American story, although America sits on the excessive finish. Globally, the sample holds precisely as Engel predicted: Nigerians spend about 59 percent of their consumption expenditures on meals at house. Bangladeshis spend 53 %. Chinese language customers spend about 21 %. People are beneath 7 % — among the many lowest seen in cross-country knowledge.

Sure, however what about proper now?

<img alt="A chart showing food expenditures in various countries." data-chromatic="ignore" loading="lazy" decoding="async" data-nimg="fill" class="mvmjsc0" style="position:absolute;height:100%;width:100%;left:0;top:0;right:0;bottom:0;color:transparent;background-size:cover;background-position:50% 50%;background-repeat:no-repeat;background-image:url("data:image/svg+xml;charset=utf-8,%3Csvg xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg' %3E%3Cfilter id='b' color-interpolation-filters='sRGB'%3E%3CfeGaussianBlur stdDeviation='20'/%3E%3CfeColorMatrix values='1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 100 -1' result='s'/%3E%3CfeFlood x='0' y='0' width='100%25' height='100%25'/%3E%3CfeComposite operator='out' in='s'/%3E%3CfeComposite in2='SourceGraphic'/%3E%3CfeGaussianBlur stdDeviation='20'/%3E%3C/filter%3E%3Cimage width='100%25' height='100%25' x='0' y='0' preserveAspectRatio='none' style='filter: url(%23b);' href=''/%3E%3C/svg%3E")" sizes="(max-width: 639px) 100vw, (max-width: 1023px) 50vw, 700px" srcset="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2026/02/share-of-food-expenditure-vs-food-expenditure.png?quality=90&strip=all&crop=0%2C0%2C100%2C100&w=256 256w, https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2026/02/share-of-food-expenditure-vs-food-expenditure.png?quality=90&strip=all&crop=0%2C0%2C100%2C100&w=376 376w, https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2026/02/share-of-food-expenditure-vs-food-expenditure.png?quality=90&strip=all&crop=0%2C0%2C100%2C100&w=384 384w, https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2026/02/share-of-food-expenditure-vs-food-expenditure.png?quality=90&strip=all&crop=0%2C0%2C100%2C100&w=415 415w, https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2026/02/share-of-food-expenditure-vs-food-expenditure.png?quality=90&strip=all&crop=0%2C0%2C100%2C100&w=480 480w, https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2026/02/share-of-food-expenditure-vs-food-expenditure.png?quality=90&strip=all&crop=0%2C0%2C100%2C100&w=540 540w, https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2026/02/share-of-food-expenditure-vs-food-expenditure.png?quality=90&strip=all&crop=0%2C0%2C100%2C100&w=640 640w, https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2026/02/share-of-food-expenditure-vs-food-expenditure.png?quality=90&strip=all&crop=0%2C0%2C100%2C100&w=750 750w, https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2026/02/share-of-food-expenditure-vs-food-expenditure.png?quality=90&strip=all&crop=0%2C0%2C100%2C100&w=828 828w, https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2026/02/share-of-food-expenditure-vs-food-expenditure.png?quality=90&strip=all&crop=0%2C0%2C100%2C100&w=1080 1080w, https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2026/02/share-of-food-expenditure-vs-food-expenditure.png?quality=90&strip=all&crop=0%2C0%2C100%2C100&w=1200 1200w, https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2026/02/share-of-food-expenditure-vs-food-expenditure.png?quality=90&strip=all&crop=0%2C0%2C100%2C100&w=1440 1440w, https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2026/02/share-of-food-expenditure-vs-food-expenditure.png?quality=90&strip=all&crop=0%2C0%2C100%2C100&w=1920 1920w, https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2026/02/share-of-food-expenditure-vs-food-expenditure.png?quality=90&strip=all&crop=0%2C0%2C100%2C100&w=2048 2048w, https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2026/02/share-of-food-expenditure-vs-food-expenditure.png?quality=90&strip=all&crop=0%2C0%2C100%2C100&w=2400 2400w" src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2026/02/share-of-food-expenditure-vs-food-expenditure.png?quality=90&strip=all&crop=0%2C0%2C100%2C100&w=2400"/> In fact, you would possibly assume that’s nice, however how come a dozen eggs were costing me $6 not that way back?

Truthful. Meals costs rose 23.6 percent between 2020 and 2024 . Egg costs spiked 8.5 % in 2024 alone, due to avian flu . Beef and veal have been up 5.4 %. The post-pandemic inflation surge was actual, and it harm — particularly on the decrease finish of the revenue ladder, the place the lowest-earning 20 percent of households spend 32.6 percent of their after-tax revenue on meals, in comparison with simply 8.1 % for the highest quintile.

However right here’s the factor: Even on the peak of the 2022 meals worth panic, when headlines screamed a couple of “31-year high” in food spending , the share of revenue People spent on meals was nonetheless decrease than any yr earlier than 1991. The “disaster” was successfully a return to early-’90s costs — which themselves would have appeared miraculously low to anybody dwelling within the Fifties.

And as Mike Konczal recently pointed out utilizing the most recent BLS shopper expenditure knowledge, the DoorDash panic will get the story backwards. People as an entire are literally spending much less of their budgets on meals away from house than earlier than the pandemic and extra on groceries. Folks beneath 25 have shifted essentially the most towards cooking at house.

The combination image will not be “People are blowing their paychecks on supply apps.” It’s “People are tightening their belts on consuming out as a result of groceries acquired costlier.”

That’s an actual affordability concern — nevertheless it’s a really totally different story than the one going viral on social media.

None of this implies America’s meals system is a straightforward triumph. The ten.4 % determine is a median, and averages disguise issues.

Begin with inequality. In 2023, households within the lowest revenue quintile spent 32.6 percent of their after-tax income on meals. The very best quintile spent 8.1 %. That’s a fourfold hole between wealthy and poor; Engel’s Regulation nonetheless at work within the trendy United States. Packages like SNAP and the Nationwide Faculty Lunch Program considerably cushion the blow. SNAP alone served roughly 42 million people per thirty days in 2023, however the underlying disparity is massive and protracted.

Then, there’s what low-cost meals is definitely product of. The agricultural revolution that introduced costs down additionally made ultra-processed meals — engineered for shelf stability, comfort, and palatability — the dominant source of calories in the American diet . The downstream penalties have been weight problems, Sort 2 diabetes, and heart problems, and so they’ve created prices that don’t present up in your grocery receipt however completely present up within the well being care system.

The value tag on the register doesn’t embody what industrial agriculture does to the land, both. American farming’s environmental footprint — greenhouse gas emissions , fertilizer runoff that feeds dead zones in the Gulf of Mexico , biodiversity loss from monoculture cropping — represents a set of externalized prices that buyers by no means straight pay. The impact on the billions of animals raised for meals, as Future Excellent has reported over the years , is unimaginably excessive. The meals is reasonable partly as a result of the environmental and welfare invoice will get despatched some other place.

I don’t wish to reduce any of those severe issues, however I additionally don’t assume they invalidate the core achievement. As this article factors out many times, progress and its caveats exist concurrently. The precise response is to handle the caveats as a result of the progress has given us the assets and the room to take action.

The truth that the typical American household can feed itself on roughly a tenth of its revenue — one thing that may have appeared like science fiction to Ernst Engel, poring over these Belgian family budgets in 1857 — is a real civilizational achievement. When a society spends much less on meals, it frees up assets for all the pieces else: for college, for medication, for saving, for dwelling. That’s human freedom, measured one grocery receipt at a time.

A model of this story initially appeared within the Good Information publication. Sign up here!

You’ve learn 1 article within the final month

Right here at Vox, we're unwavering in our dedication to protecting the problems that matter most to you — threats to democracy, immigration, reproductive rights, the surroundings, and the rising polarization throughout this nation.

Our mission is to offer clear, accessible journalism that empowers you to remain knowledgeable and engaged in shaping our world. By turning into a Vox Member, you straight strengthen our means to ship in-depth, unbiased reporting that drives significant change.