A Story Of Two California Faculty Districts

[ad_1] In a state initiative with potential nationwide implications, college districts throughout California are navigating the complexities of assembly the state’s looming Ethnic Research requirement. This mandate, primarily based on Meeting Invoice 101 (AB 101) signed into regulation by Governor Gavin Newsom in October 2021, stipulates that college students graduating in the course of the 2029–2030 college 12 months should full not less than one semester of Ethnic Research. California stands as the primary state to enact such a requirement, aiming to ostensibly foster cultural understanding by means of core ideas of equality, fairness, justice, and the research of race and ethnicity, as outlined within the California Ethnic Research Mannequin Curriculum .

As I reported beforehand right here and right here , the Northern California Pajaro Valley Unified Faculty District (PVUSD) took an formidable strategy to implementing this requirement, going past the essential framework sometimes adopted by different districts, incorporating content material in English (a number of years throughout 9 th by means of 12 th grades), Historical past, and Artwork courses. With grant funding, PVUSD employed Allyson Tintiangco-Cubales, Founder and Co-Director of Neighborhood Responsive Schooling (CRE), whose controversial mannequin curriculum had beforehand been rejected by the state for being excessively divisive and antisemitic. Regardless of public outcry — notably from the Jewish group — over the district’s reliance on the rejected curriculum, PVUSD endured by means of two rounds of session with CRE. The third spherical, nonetheless, stalled amidst rising dissent.

In 2024, the Pajaro Valley Federation of Academics, together with supporters of CRE, mobilized to change the composition of the varsity board within the November elections. They efficiently unseated three incumbents, changing them with challengers able to renew the contract with CRE. By April, the brand new board accredited the ultimate contract, signaling a shift towards dismissing group considerations. This variation was epitomized by radical activist board member Gabriel Medina, who labeled opposition to the curriculum as “propaganda” and accused dissenters of being “segregationists” intent on undermining marginalized communities. Listening to Medina’s characterizations of America in each March and April conferences, one would suppose we at the moment dwell underneath the rule of the Antebellum South.

Conversely, the Glendora Unified Faculty District (GUSD) in Southern California adopted a extra cautious technique. District workers proposed an Ethnic Research pilot course define for the 2025–2026 college 12 months, leveraging the state-approved mannequin curriculum which focuses on 4 traditionally marginalized teams: African Individuals, Chicano/Latinos, Native Individuals, and Asian American/Pacific Islanders. Introduced in February by the historical past and social science representatives, the pilot course adhered to the one-semester requirement.

Nevertheless, the proposal confronted scrutiny from the board for its lack of detailed content material and transparency relating to implementation. On the Could college board assembly, board members raised considerations about group opposition to perceived influences of Important Race Idea (CRT) throughout the curriculum’s theoretical frameworks. Whereas Assistant Superintendent Jennifer Prince emphasised that CRT was not the course’s focus, the board remained cautious of its potential affect. Respecting group enter, the board voted 3–2 towards shifting ahead with the pilot course, citing the unfunded mandate of AB 101 in addition to the necessity for additional readability and safeguards.

In contrast to PVUSD, GUSD’s board demonstrated respect for all viewpoints, emphasizing the significance of group considerations alongside the practicalities of Ethnic Research implementation. They expressed openness to revisiting the curriculum as soon as AB 101 funding is secured and a extra detailed define addressing group hesitations is developed.

Though native districts will not be required to take action, GUSD leveraged the state’s mannequin curriculum, which explicitly encourages educators undertake a CRT lens as follows: “Academics and directors… ought to familiarize themselves with present scholarly analysis round ethnic research instruction, similar to critically and culturally or group related and responsive pedagogies, essential race principle, and intersectionality, that are key theoretical frameworks and pedagogies that can be utilized in ethnic research analysis and instruction.”

This stance from the state mannequin curriculum highlights the continuing stress between ideological and non-ideological approaches to the topic. Throughout public commentary, one speaker advisable the Impartial Institute’s Comparative Cultures Ethnic Research Curriculum as a viable different. In contrast to the state framework, this curriculum examines the varied tapestry of American historical past, portraying each its challenges and triumphs to emphasise unity over division.

Though the Comparative curriculum was unavailable on the outset of GUSD’s Ethnic Research journey, it stays an choice value contemplating for the district shifting ahead. As a panelist at its launch final 12 months, I can attest to its efficacy as a balanced, non-partisan useful resource that goals to foster inclusivity with out isolating particular teams. Whereas it could be too late for PVUSD to revise its course, GUSD nonetheless can chart a unique path — one which prioritizes connection and collective development over ideological division.

The contrasting approaches taken by PVUSD and GUSD illustrate the complexities of implementing California’s Ethnic Research mandate. Whereas PVUSD’s path has fueled divisiveness and polarized group relations, GUSD’s measured strategy displays a willingness to adapt and handle considerations thoughtfully. As college districts throughout the state grapple with fulfilling AB 101, GUSD’s restraint and respect for numerous views supply a mannequin for navigating this difficult — however important — initiative.

* * *

Walter Myers III is a Senior Fellow on the Seattle-based Discovery Institute and an adjunct school member at Biola College’s Talbot Faculty of Theology.