Atletico Madrid CEO “ashamed” by Barcelona crimson card controversy

[ad_1] Atletico Madrid’s 2-1 defeat to Barcelona on Saturday has been overshadowed by a controversial name made by the refereeing crew on the Riyadh Air Metropolitano. Minutes into the second half, Gerard Martin was despatched off for a problem on Thiago Almada, earlier than the choice was downgraded to be a yellow card after a VAR overview.

Atleti have been left livid on the resolution, particularly contemplating they themselves had been diminished to 10 males simply earlier than half time. They've already submitted a complain to the Technical Committee of Referees (CTA), and CEO Miguel Angel Gil Marin has now chosen to talk publicly on the matter.

Commercial

As per Diario AS, Gil Marin expressed his disappointment at how the scenario has been dealt with by the Spanish Soccer Federation.

“Once we see the photographs and take heed to the audios shared by the Federation, all that continues to be is to really feel ashamed. It's not potential for them to allow us to take heed to their feedback, utterly opposite to what needs to be the right functioning of the VAR, and nothing occurs. Referees have the identical proper to make errors as gamers, coaches and managers, however errors within the sport are simply that, errors. One other factor is {that a} referee from the VAR predisposes the primary referee when he's judging an motion.”

Gil Marin: It’s not regular that the standards has modified Gil Marin believes that VAR had no proper to intervene within the preliminary resolution made by on-field referee Mateo Busquets Ferrer, as he didn't see the crimson card to be a transparent and apparent error.

Commercial

“The sector referee will need to have the accountability and make choices deciphering the intention of every one. VAR ought to solely intervene to right uninterpretable errors, to not resolve instead of the primary referee. It’s not regular that the standards has modified and we have no idea what to anticipate. It has occurred to us within the final two video games. It is not sensible.”

Gil Marin goes after CTA over “inconsistencies” Gil Marin used a instance made by the Referee’s Committee to again up his argument that Martin deserves to see crimson. The CTA lately famous {that a} related problem by Actual Betis’ Valentin Gomez ought to have led to a dismissal, which is why Atleti can't comprehend the choice from Saturday.

“And the worst of all is that the CTA itself explains a play a number of days in the past, assures that it ought to have been resolved by exhibiting a crimson card and yesterday in an an identical play the referee makes the right resolution and the VAR results in the error exceeding their features, these which were defined to gamers, coaches and managers and that sadly are usually not fulfilled.”