Authorized specialists analyze Diddy's protection technique in intercourse crimes case

[ad_1] NEW Now you can hearken to Fox Information articles!

The choice by Sean "Diddy" Combs' legal professionals to not name any witnesses to testify in his federal trial for intercourse crimes comes all the way down to the prosecution's burden of affordable doubt, based on authorized specialists.

Diddy's lawyer, Marc Agnifilo, indicated Monday in courtroom that the protection plans to evaluate proof with the jury, and will not require witnesses to testify on the rapper's behalf. The rapper's authorized workforce expects to relaxation its case Wednesday, with closing arguments anticipated to start the next day.

"The choice whether or not or to not name witnesses in the course of the protection case is a calculated threat," felony protection and civil lawyer Adanté Pointer of Legal professionals for the Folks LLC advised Fox Information Digital.

DIDDY DEFENSE NOT EXPECTED TO CALL ANY WITNESSES IN SEX TRAFFICKING TRIAL

Sean "Diddy" Combs will not testify in his federal trial for intercourse crimes. (Stephen Lovekin/Getty Photographs)

"Not calling any witnesses means the protection is actually telling the jury there isn't any one they know in the entire universe who can converse on Diddy's behalf to assist his protection. However, calling a witness can open that individual as much as questioning and maybe elicit damaging testimony in opposition to Diddy, relying upon their interactions with him and their information of those girls."

Pointer likened the protection's choice to not name any witnesses to a "Pandora's field."

"Given the protection is signaling they don't intend to name a single witness , they don't suppose any potential defense-friendly witnesses will end in a web achieve for Diddy. His legal professionals have primarily decided the juice isn't definitely worth the squeeze."

MISSING WITNESSES AND LINGERING QUESTIONS PLAGUE PROSECUTION AS DIDDY TRIAL NEARS CONCLUSION: EXPERT

Judge Arun Subramanian will possible ask Diddy to verify his choice to not take the stand.

"Diddy testifying would simply enable the prosecution to retell their case and put the earlier gadgets of proof in entrance of the jury for a second or third time," Pointer defined. "The prosecution would have a subject day going via each video, textual content and witness assertion made at trial in opposition to him and power Diddy to confess the authenticity of the movies, the receipts and invoices, gadgets recovered at his houses and resort rooms, and that he was current in the course of the occasions described in prior testimony.

Diddy's protection will not name any witnesses in his federal trial. (Jane Rosenberg)

"In mild of the proof already offered at trial, this may most certainly be an excoriating and humiliating cross-examination, the sort prosecutors wait their entire profession to conduct."

Closing arguments for the trial, which started May 5 with jury selection , are anticipated to start Thursday after Diddy's legal professionals defined they might solely want two days to defend their consumer.

Trial lawyer Tre Lovell advised Fox Information Digital that the protection possible needs to double down on affordable doubt, and that Diddy's "unique life-style" doesn't equal what the prosecution has proposed, which is that "Diddy shaped a felony enterprise to pleasure himself, the Tony Soprano of child oil."

LIKE WHAT YOU’RE READING? CLICK HERE FOR MORE ENTERTAINMENT NEWS

"The one cause to not name witnesses in your protection is in the event you completely consider there may be affordable doubt, and also you don’t wish to do something to remove from this, together with calling your individual witnesses," Lovell stated. "It will make sense to name a psychiatrist to elucidate that the conduct of Cassie and Jane is extra reflective of a consensual relationship, based mostly upon the autonomy every girl had, the advantages they acquired and the love that they had for Diddy.

Duddy's federal trial started Might 5 and the case is anticipated to relaxation this week. (Jane Rosenberg)

"Additional, calling executives at Dangerous Boy Leisure could be useful to distance the companies from Diddy’s extra private conduct, to dispel the felony enterprise aspect. Lastly, probably an business or authorized professional to differentiate the features of ‘intercourse employees’ versus ‘prostitution,’ to counter the prostitution cost."

Lovell added, "Nonetheless, the protection felt even calling witnesses akin to these would have the potential of adversely affecting affordable doubt, and selected to not."

Mark Chutkow , who beforehand led the felony division of the U.S. Legal professional's Workplace in Detroit, believed Diddy's choice to not testify was "a wise one."

"It is an actual large gamble to testify in a case like this the place the prosecution has introduced racketeering expenses, which permits them to convey this wealth of unhealthy acts proof there," Chutkow stated. "By taking the stand, he would simply topic himself to much more unhealthy acts that had been prohibited by the courtroom. And in order that was most likely the precise name."

CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR THE ENTERTAINMENT NEWSLETTER

"Diddy's choice to not testify can be thought-about savvy, as properly, as a result of he can say in closing, ‘Look, to the jury, the prosecution had six weeks of time to point out you, to try to show their case.’ The protection legal professionals are going to say this: 'We confirmed the affordable doubt via our cross-examination, and we do not wish to waste any extra of your time. You've gotten sufficient now to know that there is affordable doubt on this case, and that is why we did not convey a case.' And to remind the jury that the presumption of innocence all the time goes to Diddy because the defendant on this case."

Cassie Ventura testified in Sean "Diddy" Combs' federal trial for intercourse crimes. (Jane Rosenberg)

Chutkow famous how the burden of proof is on the federal government, not on the Dangerous Boy Data founder or his workforce.

"Whenever you current a case, in the event you're on the protection aspect, you higher be good, as a result of if it falls flat, you then form of transfer again the marker, and also you is likely to be in a worse place," the lawyer stated. "So typically much less is extra. I do know that some persons are suggesting that, 'Properly, wow, would not he have one thing he may placed on?' It might be in some methods a possibility for the protection to say, 'No, we did not have to.'"

WATCH: LEGAL EXPERT EXPLAINS DIDDY'S DEFENSE MOVES

With the case nearing its shut greater than seven weeks after it started, and 9 months after Diddy was arrested and charged, Chutkow thought each side did "what they sought to perform."

"The prosecution has put in all of the proof. It wasn't excluded. The protection, although, has achieved a pleasant job within the cross-examinations," he stated. "They've introduced in quite a lot of further communications between Diddy and these different girls to point out that the connection is much more advanced.

"One of many issues I feel the prosecution goes to must do on the closing argument is to principally say, 'Look, this isn't like a trafficking case that you'd see on tv. It isn't, you do not have a scenario of somebody being kidnapped and chained on a basement radiator. It is, in essence, it is a golden cage. It's one with luxurious and glamor, nevertheless it's nonetheless a cage.'"

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Chutkow added, "The opposite space that I feel that they might wish to emphasize is the blackmail on this case. That the usage of the tapes and risk of publicity of these tapes to get the ladies to adjust to what Diddy wished to do is a component of coercion in and of itself. And if I used to be on the prosecution aspect, I might look to that as compelling proof."

Combs was charged with racketeering conspiracy (RICO); intercourse trafficking by power, fraud or coercion; and transportation to interact in prostitution in a federal indictment unsealed Sept. 17. He faces 15 years to life in jail if convicted. Diddy has maintained his innocence all through.