Charlie Kirk: The American Socrates

[ad_1] <img class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="5f0ce2f175b8ec384f6af0cf75db0fea" id="6a1fc" src="https://www.conservativereview.com/media-library/eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.eyJpbWFnZSI6Imh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LnRoZWJsYXplLmNvbS9tZWRpYS1saWJyYXJ5L2NoYXJsaWUta2lyay10aGUtYW1lcmljYW4tc29jcmF0ZXMuanBnP2lkPTYxNTkyMjUyJmFtcDt3aWR0aD0xMjQ1JmFtcDtoZWlnaHQ9NzAwJmFtcDtjb29yZGluYXRlcz0wLDU0LDAsNTQiLCJleHBpcmVzX2F0IjoxNzc5NDAzNDI3fQ.lNttu_s_PXN03GJXI2kRw9pIZ1SLHFGIRoH5UPSbH4U/image.jpg" /> I'm the Turning Level USA college adviser at Arizona State College. As a philosophy professor, what Charlie Kirk was doing stood out to me instantly. It additionally stood out to the ideologue professors who didn’t like being questioned. That’s why they tried to cease him.

Charlie did one thing nobody thought potential. He walked into the center of the trendy college — the place the left claims to carry the keys to data — and did what their professors ought to have been doing all alongside: He requested questions. He challenged assumptions. He demanded readability. He gave logical arguments.

Charlie wasn’t there to attain factors or win applause. He cared about college students’ souls.

He was the American Socrates.

Modeling the Socratic dialogue Just like the Athenian thinker, Charlie confronted those that claimed to be smart. He took questions — a whole lot of them — on digicam for all to see. College students requested about gender, economics, religion, and politics. He requested if they might rationally defend their views.

Many times, Charlie turned the tables, and we noticed that the content material of the leftist classroom is irrational.

On gender ideology, he uncovered what I name the “transsexual heresy,” exhibiting college students that actuality — not ideology — defines what it means to be a person or a girl. He warned towards letting confusion dictate reality. Goal actuality issues, and he ensured that college students knew it. The mentally unwell shouldn't be capable of dictate to the remainder of us what actuality is. And anybody who doesn’t know staple items, such because the distinction between a person and a girl, isn’t prepared to show college students.

On economics, he dismantled Marxist clichés college students had absorbed from their professors, exhibiting that non-public accountability — not socialism — is the bedrock of human flourishing. They got here at him with Rousseau, stating that non-public property and “the system” pressure the “oppressed” to reside lives of crime. In a single video, a pupil instructed him the poor and marginalized must grow to be criminals, and Charlie demolished this by merely asking if they've free will. It was sensible, and everybody watching knew it.

On Christianity, he confronted the narrative that religion is merely patriarchy and white supremacy in disguise. The background narrative is that these professors hate the Bible. Professors had planted these lies within the minds of scholars to stop them from studying it.

An untold multitude of scholars had their religion shipwrecked by such professors whereas their mother and father paid the schooling. The unbelieving profs thought that they had sufficiently salted the bottom and planted tares within the area. Charlie tore them out, root and department, making ready the bottom for the gospel itself to be heard.

The professors’ ire And that’s why the professors despised him.

I’ve been in these college conferences. I’ve heard professors snigger about “deconstructing” the religion of Christian college students. I’ve watched them assign books praising witchcraft whereas condemning Christianity as “oppressive.” I’ve seen them attempt to ban Charlie Kirk from talking on campus by declaring him a “white supremacist.”

ASU “honors college” efficiently prevented him from talking on the honor faculty even whereas they held occasions on the advantages of witchcraft — whereas the outlet Jezebel bragged about hiring “Etsy witches” to hex him. If the witches hated him this a lot, it tells the nice guys he was on to one thing.

The non secular battle strains couldn't be clearer.

Charlie wasn’t there to attain factors or win applause. He cared about college students’ souls. He stood within the breach towards professors who see college students not as younger women and men looking for reality, however as recruits for his or her ideological crusades. He laughed on the diploma applications that promised jobs for college kids resembling “radical advocate.” He was there as a result of he believed these college students have been value saving from the godless ideologies peddled in lecture rooms.

Blatant hypocrisy When Charlie was murdered, some on the left rushed to say, “Let’s all relax.” There is no such thing as a ethical equivalency right here between the fitting and the left. But the left is the one who heated it up by calling him a white supremacist. The left controls the American college, the place conservatives and Christians are known as “fascist white supremacist patriarchs worse than Hitler” all day and night time.

The place was that decision for calm after George Floyd’s fentanyl overdose? Violence erupted. Cities burned. Professors excused all of it. They used class time to tout Black Lives Matter.

However you received’t see TPUSA college students burning cities BLM-style. They may do what Charlie taught them: Use logic and motive to show falsehoods. Like the scholars of Athens after Socrates’ demise, they may bear in mind the instance of the person who confronted their professors — and received.

And people professors will reside figuring out they have been weighed within the stability and located wanting. They're the baddies.

Socrates’ prediction nonetheless stands Earlier than his execution, Socrates instructed his accusers they'd face a heavier judgment than the one they inflicted on him. They killed him to silence him. However his demise solely proved their ignorance and wickedness. They have been unable to offer an account to elucidate themselves and have been uncovered as dwelling the unexamined life.

The identical is true right here.

Charlie’s demise is not going to silence him. It can amplify his instance. College students will hold questioning. They may expose the foolishness of professors who despised Charlie’s instance. And people radical professors will carry the disgrace of figuring out they tried to cowl ignorance with hatred.

RELATED: Why Charlie Kirk’s assassination will change us in methods this era has by no means seen

Picture by Rebecca Noble/Getty Photographs

As a Christian pastor, I do know Charlie noticed that souls have been at stake. Charlie publicly professed Christ to be his savior, and the ideological professors understand it additionally. They noticed college students giving their souls in religion to Christ slightly than John Cash and hated it.

Now these professors suppose Charlie is silenced, however they need to reside with their very own darkness. They'll repent — or they may reside in that darkness endlessly and face the judgment of God. The blood of martyrs has at all times been the seed of revival.

Might the Lord use Charlie’s life — and sure, even his demise — to boost up a era of scholars who love reality, pursue knowledge, and refuse to bow to the false gods of the trendy college. Let’s query godless professors to disclose to everybody watching that they don’t know clear truths about God and what's good.