ChatGPT sucks at being an actual robotic

[ad_1] There’s one thing unhappy about seeing a humanoid robotic mendacity on the ground. With none electrical energy, these bipedal machines can’t arise, so in the event that they’re powered down and never hanging from a winch, they’re sprawled out on the ground, staring up at you, helpless.

That’s how I met Atlas a few months in the past. I’d seen the robotic on YouTube 100 occasions, running obstacle courses and doing backflips . Then I noticed it on the ground of a lab at MIT. It was simply mendacity there. The distinction is jarring, if solely as a result of humanoid robots have turn into a lot extra succesful and ubiquitous since Atlas bought well-known on YouTube.

Throughout city at Boston Dynamics, the corporate that makes Atlas, a more recent model of the humanoid robotic had discovered not solely to stroll but additionally to drop things and pick them back up instinctively, due to a single synthetic intelligence mannequin that controls its motion. A few of these next-generation Atlas robots will quickly be engaged on manufacturing facility flooring — and should enterprise additional. Thanks partly to AI, general-purpose humanoids of all sorts appear inevitable.

“In Shenzhen, you may already see them strolling down the road each now and again,” Russ Tedrake informed me again at MIT. “You’ll begin seeing them in your life in locations which can be most likely boring, soiled, and harmful.”

Tedrake runs the Robotic Locomotion Group on the MIT Laptop Science and Synthetic Intelligence Lab, often known as CSAIL, and he co-led the project that produced the most recent AI-powered Atlas. Strolling was as soon as the laborious factor for robots to be taught, however not anymore. Tedrake’s group has shifted focus from educating robots how you can transfer to serving to them perceive and work together with the world via software program, specifically AI. They’re not the one ones.

In the USA, enterprise capital funding robotics startups grew from $42.6 million in 2020 to just about $2.8 billion in 2025. Morgan Stanley predicts the cumulative world gross sales of humanoids will attain 900,000 in 2030 and explode to greater than 1 billion by 2050, the overwhelming majority of which will likely be for industrial and industrial functions. Some consider these robots will finally exchange human labor, ushering in a new global economic order . In spite of everything, we designed the world for people, so humanoids ought to be capable of navigate it with ease and do what we do.

<img alt="an illustration of one nervous person and three robots all transporting brown boxes together in a line" data-chromatic="ignore" loading="lazy" decoding="async" data-nimg="fill" class="mvmjsc0" style="position:absolute;height:100%;width:100%;left:0;top:0;right:0;bottom:0;color:transparent;background-size:cover;background-position:50% 50%;background-repeat:no-repeat;background-image:url("data:image/svg+xml;charset=utf-8,%3Csvg xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg' %3E%3Cfilter id='b' color-interpolation-filters='sRGB'%3E%3CfeGaussianBlur stdDeviation='20'/%3E%3CfeColorMatrix values='1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 100 -1' result='s'/%3E%3CfeFlood x='0' y='0' width='100%25' height='100%25'/%3E%3CfeComposite operator='out' in='s'/%3E%3CfeComposite in2='SourceGraphic'/%3E%3CfeGaussianBlur stdDeviation='20'/%3E%3C/filter%3E%3Cimage width='100%25' height='100%25' x='0' y='0' preserveAspectRatio='none' style='filter: url(%23b);' href=''/%3E%3C/svg%3E")" sizes="(max-width: 639px) 100vw, (max-width: 1023px) 50vw, 700px" srcset="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2026/01/vox-highlight-spot02-story01.png?quality=90&strip=all&crop=0%2C0%2C100%2C100&w=256 256w, https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2026/01/vox-highlight-spot02-story01.png?quality=90&strip=all&crop=0%2C0%2C100%2C100&w=376 376w, https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2026/01/vox-highlight-spot02-story01.png?quality=90&strip=all&crop=0%2C0%2C100%2C100&w=384 384w, https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2026/01/vox-highlight-spot02-story01.png?quality=90&strip=all&crop=0%2C0%2C100%2C100&w=415 415w, https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2026/01/vox-highlight-spot02-story01.png?quality=90&strip=all&crop=0%2C0%2C100%2C100&w=480 480w, https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2026/01/vox-highlight-spot02-story01.png?quality=90&strip=all&crop=0%2C0%2C100%2C100&w=540 540w, https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2026/01/vox-highlight-spot02-story01.png?quality=90&strip=all&crop=0%2C0%2C100%2C100&w=640 640w, https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2026/01/vox-highlight-spot02-story01.png?quality=90&strip=all&crop=0%2C0%2C100%2C100&w=750 750w, https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2026/01/vox-highlight-spot02-story01.png?quality=90&strip=all&crop=0%2C0%2C100%2C100&w=828 828w, https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2026/01/vox-highlight-spot02-story01.png?quality=90&strip=all&crop=0%2C0%2C100%2C100&w=1080 1080w, https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2026/01/vox-highlight-spot02-story01.png?quality=90&strip=all&crop=0%2C0%2C100%2C100&w=1200 1200w, https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2026/01/vox-highlight-spot02-story01.png?quality=90&strip=all&crop=0%2C0%2C100%2C100&w=1440 1440w, https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2026/01/vox-highlight-spot02-story01.png?quality=90&strip=all&crop=0%2C0%2C100%2C100&w=1920 1920w, https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2026/01/vox-highlight-spot02-story01.png?quality=90&strip=all&crop=0%2C0%2C100%2C100&w=2048 2048w, https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2026/01/vox-highlight-spot02-story01.png?quality=90&strip=all&crop=0%2C0%2C100%2C100&w=2400 2400w" src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2026/01/vox-highlight-spot02-story01.png?quality=90&strip=all&crop=0%2C0%2C100%2C100&w=2400"/> Janik Söllner for Vox

They received’t all be manufacturing facility staff, if sure startups get their means. An organization known as X1 Applied sciences has started taking preorders for its $20,000 dwelling robotic, Neo, which wears garments, does dishes, and fetches snacks from the fridge. Determine AI introduced its Determine 03 humanoid robotic, which additionally does chores. Sunday Robotics said it will have totally autonomous robots making espresso in beta testers’ properties subsequent 12 months.

Up to now, we’ve seen numerous demos of those AI-powered dwelling robots and guarantees from the commercial humanoid makers, however not a lot in the best way of a brand new world financial order. Demos of dwelling robots, just like the X1 Neo, have relied on human operators , making these automatons, in follow, extra like puppets. Studies suggest that Determine AI and Apptronik have just one or two robots on manufacturing flooring at any given time, often doing menial duties. That’s a proof of idea, not a menace to the human work drive.

“To be able to make them higher, we now have to make AI higher.”

You possibly can consider all these robots because the bodily embodiment of AI, or simply embodied AI. That is what occurs while you put AI right into a bodily system, enabling it to work together with the true world. Whether or not that’s within the type of a humanoid robotic or an autonomous automobile, it’s the following frontier for {hardware} and, arguably, technological progress writ massive.

Embodied AI is already remodeling how farming works , how we move goods around the world , and what’s possible in surgical theaters . We is perhaps only one or two breakthroughs away from strolling, speaking, pondering machines that may work alongside us, unlocking a complete new realm of potentialities. “May” is the important thing phrase there.

“If we’re searching for robots that can work facet by facet with us within the subsequent couple of years, I don’t suppose will probably be humanoids,” Daniela Rus, director of CSAIL, informed me not lengthy after I left Tedrake’s lab. “Humanoids are actually difficult, and we now have to make them higher. And to be able to make them higher, we now have to make AI higher.”

So to know the hole between the hype round humanoids and the know-how’s actual promise, you must know what AI can and might’t do for robots. You additionally, sadly, must attempt to perceive what Elon Musk has been as much as at Tesla for the previous 5 years.

It’s nonetheless embarrassing to observe the a part of the Tesla AI Day presentation in 2021 when a human individual wearing a robotic costume appears on stage dancing to dubstep music . Musk finally stops the dance and proclaims that Tesla, “a robotics firm,” may have a prototype of a general-purpose humanoid robotic, now often called Optimus, the next 12 months. Not many individuals believed him , and now, years later, Tesla nonetheless has not delivered a totally useful Optimus. By no means afraid to make a prediction, Musk informed audiences at Davos in January 2026 that Tesla’s robotic will go on sale next year .

“Folks took him severely as a result of he had an important monitor report,” stated Ken Goldberg , a roboticist on the College of California-Berkeley and co-founder of Ambi Robotics . “I feel individuals have been impressed by that.”

You possibly can think about why individuals bought excited, although. With the Optimus robotic, Elon Musk promised to remove poverty and offer shareholders “infinite” profits . He stated engineers may successfully translate Tesla’s self-driving automobile know-how into software program that would energy autonomous robots that would work in factories or assist round the home. It’s a model of the identical imaginative and prescient humanoid robotics startups are chasing right this moment, albeit coloured by a number of years of Musk’s unfulfilled guarantees.

We now know that Optimus struggles with numerous the identical issues as different makes an attempt at general-purpose humanoids. It typically requires humans to remotely operate it , and it struggles with dexterity and precision. The 1X Neo, likewise, wanted a human’s assist to open a fridge door and collapsed onto the floor in a demo for a New York Instances journalist final 12 months. The {hardware} appears succesful sufficient. Optimus can dance , and Neo can fold garments, albeit a bit clumsily . However they don’t but perceive physics. They don’t know how you can plan or to improvise. They actually can’t suppose.

“Folks generally get too excited by the thought of the robotic and never the fact.”

“Folks generally get too excited by the thought of the robotic and never the fact,” stated Rodney Brooks , co-founder of iRobot, makers of the Roomba robotic vacuum. Brooks, a former CSAIL director, has written extensively and skeptically about humanoid robots.

Clearly, there’s a gap between what’s taking place in analysis labs and what’s being deployed in the true world. A few of the optimism round humanoids is predicated on good science, although. In 2023, Tedrake coauthored a landmark paper with Tony Zhao, co-founder and CEO of Sunday Robotics, that outlined a novel technique for coaching robots to maneuver like people. It includes people performing the duty carrying sensor-laden gloves that ship knowledge to an AI mannequin that allows the robotic to determine how you can do these duties. This complemented work Tedrake was doing on the Toyota Analysis Institute that used the identical sorts of strategies AI fashions use to generate photos to generate robot behavior . You’ve heard of enormous language fashions, or LLMs. Tedrake calls these massive conduct fashions, or LBMs.

It is sensible. By watching people do issues again and again, these AI fashions acquire sufficient knowledge to generate new behaviors that may adapt to altering environments. Folding laundry, for instance, is a well-liked instance of a job that requires nimble arms and higher brains. If a robotic picks up a shirt and the material flops down in an sudden means, it wants to determine how you can deal with that uncertainty. You possibly can’t merely program it to know what to do when there are such a lot of variables. You possibly can, nonetheless, train it to be taught.

That’s what makes the lemonade demo so spectacular. A few of Rus’s college students at CSAIL have been educating a humanoid robotic named Rudy to make lemonade — one thing that you may want a robotic butler to do someday — by carrying sensors that measure not solely the actions however the forces concerned. It’s a mixture of delicate actions, like pouring sugar, and robust ones, like lifting a jug of water. I watched Ruby do that with out spilling a drop. It hadn’t been programmed to make lemonade. It had discovered.

The true problem is getting this technique to scale. A technique is just to brute drive it: Make use of 1000's of people to carry out fundamental duties, like folding laundry, to construct basis fashions for the bodily world. Basis fashions are the huge datasets that may be tailored to particular duties like producing textual content, photos, or on this case, robotic conduct. You too can get people to teleoperate numerous robots to be able to prepare these fashions. These so-called arm farms exist already in warehouses in Japanese Europe, and they’re about as dystopian as they sound .

Another choice is YouTube. There are numerous how-to movies on YouTube, and a few researchers suppose that feeding all of them into an AI mannequin will present sufficient knowledge to present robots a greater understanding of how the world works. These two-dimensional movies are clearly restricted, if solely as a result of they will’t inform us something in regards to the physics of the objects within the body. The identical goes for artificial knowledge, which includes a pc quickly and repeatedly finishing up a job in a simulation. The upside right here, after all, is extra knowledge, extra rapidly. The draw back is that the information isn’t pretty much as good, particularly in terms of bodily forces like friction and torque, which additionally occur to be a very powerful for robotic dexterity.

“Physics is a tricky job to grasp,” Brooks stated. “And you probably have a robotic, which isn't good with physics, within the presence of individuals, it doesn’t finish properly.”

<img alt="an illustration of a robot butler tripping up some stairs. Food and drinks fly everywhere." data-chromatic="ignore" loading="lazy" decoding="async" data-nimg="fill" class="mvmjsc0" style="position:absolute;height:100%;width:100%;left:0;top:0;right:0;bottom:0;color:transparent;background-size:cover;background-position:50% 50%;background-repeat:no-repeat;background-image:url("data:image/svg+xml;charset=utf-8,%3Csvg xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg' %3E%3Cfilter id='b' color-interpolation-filters='sRGB'%3E%3CfeGaussianBlur stdDeviation='20'/%3E%3CfeColorMatrix values='1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 100 -1' result='s'/%3E%3CfeFlood x='0' y='0' width='100%25' height='100%25'/%3E%3CfeComposite operator='out' in='s'/%3E%3CfeComposite in2='SourceGraphic'/%3E%3CfeGaussianBlur stdDeviation='20'/%3E%3C/filter%3E%3Cimage width='100%25' height='100%25' x='0' y='0' preserveAspectRatio='none' style='filter: url(%23b);' href=''/%3E%3C/svg%3E")" sizes="(max-width: 639px) 100vw, (max-width: 1023px) 50vw, 700px" srcset="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2026/01/vox-highlight-spot01-story01.png?quality=90&strip=all&crop=0%2C0%2C100%2C100&w=256 256w, https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2026/01/vox-highlight-spot01-story01.png?quality=90&strip=all&crop=0%2C0%2C100%2C100&w=376 376w, https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2026/01/vox-highlight-spot01-story01.png?quality=90&strip=all&crop=0%2C0%2C100%2C100&w=384 384w, https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2026/01/vox-highlight-spot01-story01.png?quality=90&strip=all&crop=0%2C0%2C100%2C100&w=415 415w, https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2026/01/vox-highlight-spot01-story01.png?quality=90&strip=all&crop=0%2C0%2C100%2C100&w=480 480w, https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2026/01/vox-highlight-spot01-story01.png?quality=90&strip=all&crop=0%2C0%2C100%2C100&w=540 540w, https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2026/01/vox-highlight-spot01-story01.png?quality=90&strip=all&crop=0%2C0%2C100%2C100&w=640 640w, https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2026/01/vox-highlight-spot01-story01.png?quality=90&strip=all&crop=0%2C0%2C100%2C100&w=750 750w, https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2026/01/vox-highlight-spot01-story01.png?quality=90&strip=all&crop=0%2C0%2C100%2C100&w=828 828w, https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2026/01/vox-highlight-spot01-story01.png?quality=90&strip=all&crop=0%2C0%2C100%2C100&w=1080 1080w, https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2026/01/vox-highlight-spot01-story01.png?quality=90&strip=all&crop=0%2C0%2C100%2C100&w=1200 1200w, https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2026/01/vox-highlight-spot01-story01.png?quality=90&strip=all&crop=0%2C0%2C100%2C100&w=1440 1440w, https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2026/01/vox-highlight-spot01-story01.png?quality=90&strip=all&crop=0%2C0%2C100%2C100&w=1920 1920w, https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2026/01/vox-highlight-spot01-story01.png?quality=90&strip=all&crop=0%2C0%2C100%2C100&w=2048 2048w, https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2026/01/vox-highlight-spot01-story01.png?quality=90&strip=all&crop=0%2C0%2C100%2C100&w=2400 2400w" src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2026/01/vox-highlight-spot01-story01.png?quality=90&strip=all&crop=0%2C0%2C100%2C100&w=2400"/> Janik Söllner for Vox

That’s not even bearing in mind the various different bottlenecks going through robotics proper now. Whereas parts have gotten cheaper — you should buy a humanoid robotic proper now for less than $6,000 , in comparison with the $75,000 it cost to purchase Boston Dynamics’ small, four-legged robotic Spot 5 years in the past — batteries characterize a serious bottleneck for robotics, restricted the run time of most humanoids to two to four hours .

Then you've gotten the issue with processing energy. The AI fashions that may make humanoids extra human require large quantities of compute. If that’s achieved within the cloud, you’ve bought latency points, stopping the robotic from reacting in actual time. And inevitably, to tie numerous different constraints right into a tidy bundle, the AI is simply not adequate.

For those who hint the historical past of AI and the historical past of robotics again to their origins, you’ll see a braided line. The 2 applied sciences have intersected repeatedly, for the reason that start of the time period “synthetic intelligence” at a Dartmouth summer research workshop in the summertime of 1956. Then, half a century later, issues began heating up on the AI entrance, when advances in machine studying and highly effective processors known as GPUs — the issues which have now made Nvidia a $5 trillion company — ushered within the period of deep studying. I’m about to throw just a few technical phrases at you so bear with me.

Machine studying is a sort of AI. It’s when algorithms search for patterns in knowledge and make selections with out being explicitly skilled to take action. Deep studying takes it to a different stage with the assistance of a machine studying mannequin known as a neural community. You possibly can consider a neural community, a concept that’s even older than AI , as a system loosely modeled on the human mind that’s made up of numerous synthetic neurons that do math issues. Deep studying makes use of multilayered neural networks to be taught from enormous knowledge units and to make selections and predictions. Amongst different accomplishments, neural networks have revolutionized computer vision to enhance notion in robots.

There are totally different architectures for neural networks that may do various things, like acknowledge photos or generate textual content. One is named a transformer. The “GPT” in ChatGPT stands for “generative pre-trained transformer,” which is a sort of enormous language mannequin, or LLM, that powers many generative AI chatbots. When you’d suppose LLMs can be good at making robots suppose, they actually aren’t. Then there are diffusion fashions, which are sometimes used for picture technology and, extra just lately, making robots seem to suppose. The framework that Tedrake and his coauthors described of their 2023 analysis into utilizing generative AI to coach robots is predicated on diffusion.

“Underneath the hood, what’s truly occurring needs to be one thing rather more like our personal brains”

Three issues stand out on this very restricted rationalization of how AI and robots get alongside. One is that deep studying requires a large quantity of processing energy and, because of this, an enormous quantity of power. The opposite is that the most recent AI fashions work with the assistance of stacks of neural networks whose hundreds of thousands and even billions of synthetic neurons do their magic in mysterious and often inefficient methods. The third factor is that, whereas LLMs are good at language, and diffusion fashions are good at photos, we don’t have any fashions which can be adequate at physics to ship a 200-pound robotic marching right into a crowd to shake arms and make buddies.

As Josh Tenenbaum, a computational cognitive scientist at MIT, defined to me just lately, an LLM could make it simpler to speak to a robotic, however it’s hardly able to being the robotic’s brains. “You may think about a system the place there’s a language mannequin, there’s a chatbot, you wish to speak to your robotic,” Tenenbaum stated. “Underneath the hood, what’s truly occurring needs to be one thing rather more like our personal brains and minds or different animals, not simply people by way of the way it’s embodied and offers with the world.”

So we want higher AI for robots, if not generally. Scientists at CSAIL have been engaged on a few physics-inspired and brain-like applied sciences they’re calling liquid neural networks and linear optical networks. They each fall into the class of state-spaced models , that are rising as an alternative or rival to transformer-based models . Whereas transformer-based fashions have a look at all accessible knowledge to establish what’s vital, state-spaced fashions are rather more environment friendly, as they keep a abstract of the world that will get up to date as new knowledge is available in. It’s nearer to how the human mind works.

To be completely trustworthy, I’d by no means heard of state-space fashions till Rus, the CSAIL director, informed me about them after we chatted in her workplace just a few weeks in the past. She pulled up a video for example the distinction between a liquid neural community and a standard mannequin used for self-driving automobiles. In it, you may see how the normal mannequin focuses its consideration on all the things however the street, whereas the newer state-space mannequin solely seems on the street. If I’m using in that automobile, by the best way, I need the AI that’s watching the street.

“And as a substitute of 100 thousand neurons,” Rus says, referring to the normal neural community, “I've solely 19.” And right here’s the place it will get actually compelling. She added, “And since I've solely 19, I can truly work out how these neurons hearth and what the correlation is between these neurons and the motion of the automobile.”

You could have already heard that we don’t really know how AI works . If newer approaches deliver us just a little bit nearer to comprehension, it actually appears value taking them severely, particularly if we’re speaking in regards to the sorts of brains we’ll put in humanoid robots.

When a humanoid robotic loses energy, when electrical energy stops flowing to the motors that hold it upright, it collapses right into a heap of heavy metallic elements. This may occur for any variety of causes. Perhaps it’s a bug within the code or a misplaced wifi connection. And once they’re on, humanoids are filled with power as their joints struggle gravity or stand able to bend. For those who think about being on the improper facet of that unbelievable mechanical energy, it’s simple to doubt this know-how.

Some corporations that make humanoid robots also admit that they’re not very useful yet . They’re too unreliable to assist out round the home, they usually’re not environment friendly sufficient to be useful in factories. Moreover, a lot of the cash being spent creating robots is being spent on making them secure round individuals. In the case of deploying robots that may contribute to productiveness, that may take part within the financial system, it makes much more sense to make them extremely specialised and never human-shaped.

“Let’s not do open coronary heart surgical procedure straight away with this stuff”

The embodied AI that can remodel the world within the close to future is what’s already on the market. In actual fact, it’s what’s been on the market for years. Early self-driving automobiles date again to the Eighties, when Ernst Dickmanns put a vision-guided Mercedes van on the streets of Munich. Researchers from Carnegie Mellon College bought a minivan to drive itself across the United States in 1995. Now, many years later, Waymo is working its robotaxi service in a half dozen American cities, and the corporate says its AI-powered automobiles truly make the roads safer for everybody.

Then there are the Roombas of the world, the robots which can be designed to do one factor and hold getting higher at it. You possibly can embody the huge array of more and more clever manufacturing and warehouse robots on this camp too. By 2027, the 12 months Elon Musk is on monitor to overlook his deadline to begin promoting Optimus humanoids to the general public, Amazon will reportedly exchange greater than 600,000 jobs with robots. These would most likely be boring robots, however they’re secure and efficient.

Science fiction promised us humanoids, nonetheless. Decide an period in human historical past, the truth is, and somebody was dreaming about an automaton that would transfer like us, speak like us, and do all our soiled work. Replicants, androids, the Mechanical Turk — all these humanoid fantasies imagined an clever artificial self.

Actuality gave us package-toting platforms on wheels roving round Amazon warehouses or the sensor-heavy self-driving automobiles clogging San Francisco streets. In time, even the skeptics suppose that humanoids will likely be attainable. Most likely not in 5 years, however possibly in 50, we’ll get artificially clever companions who can stroll alongside us. They’ll take child steps.

“Good robots are going to be clumsy at first, and you must discover functions the place it’s okay for the robotic to make errors after which recuperate,” Tedrake stated. “Let’s not do open-heart surgical procedure straight away with this stuff. That is extra like folding laundry.”