CIA Director Ratcliffe retracts 19 intelligence assessments deemed biased

[ad_1] NEW Now you can take heed to Fox Information articles!

The CIA on Friday mentioned that director John Ratcliffe had ordered the retraction or "substantive revision" of 19 intelligence assessments over the previous decade that have been deemed to be politically biased.

In a launch, the CIA included three redacted assessments from between 2015 and 2021 that associated to White ladies's extremist radicalization, assaults on LGBT activists within the Center East and Africa, and the COVID-19 pandemic limiting entry to contraception in creating international locations.

"The intelligence merchandise we launched to the American individuals immediately — produced earlier than my tenure as DCIA — fall in need of the excessive requirements of impartiality that CIA should uphold and don't mirror the experience for which our analysts are famend," Ratcliffe mentioned in an announcement.

He added, "There's completely no room for bias in our work and after we establish situations the place analytic rigor has been compromised, now we have a duty to appropriate the report. These actions underscore our dedication to transparency, accountability, and goal intelligence evaluation. Our current successes in Operation ABSOLUTE RESOLVE and Operation MIDNIGHT HAMMER exemplify our dedication to analytic excellence."

BRENNAN DIRECTED PUBLICATION OF 'IMPLAUSIBLE' REPORTS CLAIMING PUTIN PREFERRED TRUMP IN 2016, HOUSE FOUND

The CIA on Friday mentioned that director John Ratcliffe had ordered the retraction or "substantive revision" of 19 intelligence assessments over the previous decade that have been deemed to be politically biased. (Saul Loeb/AFP through Getty Photographs)

The CIA launch mentioned the assessments have been recognized by the President’s Intelligence Advisory Board, which did an impartial assessment on a whole bunch of stories from the final decade, including that the assessments "didn't meet CIA and IC analytic tradecraft requirements and didn't be impartial of political consideration."

The company mentioned an inner assessment led by Deputy Director Michael Ellis "agreed that they didn't meet the excessive requirements the American individuals anticipate from CIA’s elite analytic workforce."

CIA DIRECTOR WAS IN VENEZUELA TO MEET WITH ACTING PRESIDENT DELCY RODRIGUEZ, OFFICIAL SAYS

The primary of the three stories included within the launch was titled "Ladies Advancing White Racially and Ethnically Motivated Violent Extremist Radicalization and Recruitment," and was printed in October 2021, within the first yr of the Biden administration.

It centered on ladies in teams abroad "that incite, facilitate or conduct violence as a result of they imagine that their notion of an idealized, white European ethnic identification is beneath assault from individuals who embody and assist multiculturalism and globalization."

The second report was titled "Center East-North Africa : LGBT Activists Below Stress, " and was launched close to the tip of the Obama administration.

CIA Director John Ratcliffe mentioned the stories fall "in need of the excessive requirements of impartiality that CIA should uphold." (Jemal Countess/AFP through Getty Photographs)

That evaluation claimed that "The robust stance taken towards the lesbian, homosexual, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) group by governments within the Center East most likely is pushed by conservative public opinion and home political competitors from Islamists, and is hindering US initiatives in assist of LGBT rights."

The final declassified report included within the CIA launch was titled "Worldwide: Pandemic-Associated Contraceptive Shortfalls Threaten Financial Growth, " and was printed in July 2020, practically the tip of President Donald Trump ’s first time period.

"The COVID-19 pandemic is limiting contraceptive access within the creating world and can most likely undermine efforts to handle inhabitants pressures there which are hindering financial improvement," it acknowledged.

<source media="(max-width: 767px)" srcset="https://a57.foxnews.com/static.foxnews.com/foxnews.com/content/uploads/2026/02/343/192/cover-page-of-declassified-cia-assessment-on-radicalized-white-women.jpg?ve=1&tl=1, https://a57.foxnews.com/static.foxnews.com/foxnews.com/content/uploads/2026/02/686/384/cover-page-of-declassified-cia-assessment-on-radicalized-white-women.jpg?ve=1&tl=1 2x" height="192" width="343"><source media="(min-width: 768px) and (max-width: 1023px)" srcset="https://a57.foxnews.com/static.foxnews.com/foxnews.com/content/uploads/2026/02/672/378/cover-page-of-declassified-cia-assessment-on-radicalized-white-women.jpg?ve=1&tl=1, https://a57.foxnews.com/static.foxnews.com/foxnews.com/content/uploads/2026/02/1344/756/cover-page-of-declassified-cia-assessment-on-radicalized-white-women.jpg?ve=1&tl=1 2x" height="378" width="672"><source media="(min-width: 1024px) and (max-width: 1279px)" srcset="https://a57.foxnews.com/static.foxnews.com/foxnews.com/content/uploads/2026/02/931/523/cover-page-of-declassified-cia-assessment-on-radicalized-white-women.jpg?ve=1&tl=1, https://a57.foxnews.com/static.foxnews.com/foxnews.com/content/uploads/2026/02/1862/1046/cover-page-of-declassified-cia-assessment-on-radicalized-white-women.jpg?ve=1&tl=1 2x" height="523" width="931"><source media="(min-width: 1280px)" srcset="https://a57.foxnews.com/static.foxnews.com/foxnews.com/content/uploads/2026/02/720/405/cover-page-of-declassified-cia-assessment-on-radicalized-white-women.jpg?ve=1&tl=1, https://a57.foxnews.com/static.foxnews.com/foxnews.com/content/uploads/2026/02/1440/810/cover-page-of-declassified-cia-assessment-on-radicalized-white-women.jpg?ve=1&tl=1 2x" height="405" width="720"> Cowl web page of a declassified CIA evaluation on radicalized White ladies. (CIA)

A senior administration official who spoke to The New York Instances on situation of anonymity mentioned that many of the remainder of the flagged assessments handled range, fairness and inclusion.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

The Instances added that former officers it spoke to each questioned the choice to declassify the three paperwork and the claims that the assessments have been flawed, believing they only confirmed the coverage priorities of previous administrations.