Karoline Leavitt Responds to Epstein Firestorm—However Sidesteps the One Query That Issues Most

[ad_1] This text initially appeared on vigilantfox.com and was republished with permission.

Karoline Leavitt was simply flooded with questions in regards to the so-called Epstein “HOAX.”

Reporters didn’t go simple on her.

One requested why the DOJ remains to be holding the recordsdata as an alternative of releasing a redacted model.

Her responses immediately solely raised extra eyebrows.

Ask People how they really feel in regards to the dealing with of the Epstein recordsdata, and also you’ll hear the identical reply from either side of the aisle: whole frustration.

In accordance with a current ballot, simply 3% of People say they’re glad with how the Trump administration has dealt with it.

In the meantime, half the nation is dissatisfied and believes the administration hasn’t been clear.

People are livid as a result of on February twenty first, Pam Bondi informed the world the Epstein shopper checklist was “sitting on [her] desk proper now to overview,” explaining it was a part of a directive ordered by President Trump.

However on July 7, the Trump Justice Division concluded through inside memo that Epstein truly had no shopper checklist, didn’t blackmail anybody, and undoubtedly killed himself.

This strolling again of earlier claims has unleashed a frenzy.

Trump isn’t making the scenario any higher, although.

Yesterday, the president doubled down once more, calling the Epstein Information a “hoax”, accusing Democrats of “planting” disinformation within the paperwork in the course of the 4 years they managed the Justice Division.

He says his Justice Division will launch what is taken into account “credible” data, and no extra.

The primary spherical of Epstein questioning immediately got here from Fox Information reporter Jacqui Heinrich, who grilled Karoline Leavitt on President Trump’s current declare that the Epstein recordsdata are a “hoax.”

“There’s been quite a lot of dialogue in regards to the Epstein recordsdata and the president’s feedback yesterday calling it a hoax. Are you able to make clear which half is the hoax?” Heinrich requested.

Leavitt stood by the president, saying, “The president is referring to the truth that Democrats are all of a sudden pretending they ever cared about transparency relating to Jeffrey Epstein, which is an asinine suggestion.”

“They'd management of the White Home and Congress and did nothing to reveal Epstein or his community,” she added.

Leavitt went on to defend Trump’s dealing with of the case, saying, “It was President Trump who ordered the DOJ and Lawyer Normal to conduct a full overview of the Epstein recordsdata, they usually did.”

She emphasised that the individuals in control of the overview (Pam Bondi, Dan Bongino, and Kash Patel) have been chosen for a purpose. “A number of the most trusted voices in our motion. That’s why the president appointed them,” she stated.

“They spent months combing by the fabric and concluded what was revealed in that memo.”

Leavitt insisted President Trump “has been clear” on Epstein and “adopted by [on] his guarantees to the American individuals.”

She accused Democrats and the media of exaggerating the problem to distract from Trump’s current accomplishments, saying they’re pretending “it's the largest or the American individuals care about.”

Leavitt then highlighted a number of of Trump’s achievements, she stated, have been ignored by the press, comparable to securing $90 billion in investments for Pennsylvania, assembly with the King of Bahrain to deliver international funding to the U.S., and signing a bipartisan invoice to fight fentanyl deaths after assembly with households who misplaced kids to the disaster.

“These are the problems the president cares about,” and “these are the problems this president goes to stay targeted on,” Leavitt stated.

One reporter requested Leavitt if Trump could be appointing a particular prosecutor within the Epstein case.

Leavitt’s response? A tough NO.

REPORTER: “The president has stated he floated the thought of a particular prosecutor within the Epstein case. Are you able to verify that, and has he requested the Lawyer Normal to do that—to nominate a particular prosecutor to look it over?”

LEAVITT: “Nicely, the thought was floated from somebody within the media to the president. The president wouldn't suggest a particular prosecutor within the Epstein case. That’s how he feels. And as for his discussions with the Lawyer Normal, I’m undecided.”

Then got here the pointed query everybody needs to know.

Fox Information reporter Jacqui Heinrich requested why the Justice Division doesn’t merely launch what they know, redact the delicate components, and let the American individuals determine what to make of the Epstein story.

Leavitt’s response? A traditional deflection.

She stated these selections relaxation with the Justice Division, not the White Home.

Primarily, “Don’t ask me.”

One reporter jumped in, questioning why President Trump fired Maurene Comey, former FBI Director James Comey’s daughter, who served because the lead prosecutor in each the Ghislaine Maxwell and Diddy circumstances.

Leavitt shortly corrected the declare, saying it was the DOJ—not the president—who made that decision.

Leavitt closed with a agency message geared toward Trump supporters who're starting to lose religion within the president after the Epstein fallout:

“This president is a good president as a result of he listens. He takes in each perspective. However in the end, he’s led this nation to historic success—not simply prior to now six months, however all through his first 4 years because the founding father of the MAGA motion. He’s led by perilous instances with intuition and energy. And as I all the time say, the American individuals ought to belief in President Trump.”

If that is “transparency” and there’s nothing to cover, why does it nonetheless really feel like they’re hiding the whole lot?

The story went from the shopper checklist being “on [Pam Bondi’s] desk” to “there is no such thing as a shopper checklist,” and the entire thing is a “hoax.”