Late final month, Gov. Gavin Newsom’s (D-CA) spouse appeared at one thing known as the Widespread Sense Summit on Youngsters and Households in San Francisco and bragged about coming laws that can drive tech firms to “be a drive for good” in terms of stopping boys from turning into Republican-curious.
In fact, “a drive for good” shall be Gavin and Jennifer Siebel Newsom’s definition of “good,” which implies that queering and transing children is a advantage whereas conservative beliefs develop into unlawful.
California’s obnoxious and authoritarian “first accomplice” assured the assembled group that she was solely referring to Andrew Tate, however everyone knows how this works, the place all of it leads, and that the slippery slope is a really actual factor in terms of Democrats. For instance, in 2008, Barack Obama mentioned he opposed same-sex marriage. A mere 12 years later, Democrats have been already completely sterilizing and mutilating children, internet hosting drag queen story hours at public libraries, and filling elementary colleges with homosexual porn.
Anybody who thinks the Grotesque Newsoms will cease at censoring Andrew Tate is both an fool or a liar. However when you pay attention carefully, she’s already admitting this laws will go waaaaay past Tate, which might be unhealthy sufficient. I’m no Andrew Tate fan, however I dislike censorship much more. Right here’s the clip:
She warned:
Boys, everyone knows … are shifting away from the extra progressive—Boys [who] have hung out on-line are shifting just a little bit—I’m making an attempt to not be political right here however are shifting to the precise and are being form of influenced by the Andrew Tates and a few of that form of alt-right socialization on-line that we all know may be very, very harmful. My husband and I have been alarmed when our children have been watching sports activities on-line. My son knew about Andrew Tate, thought he was fairly cool… We have been one of the vital progressive households and our son is confused and asking all these questions.
Then comes the government-mandated reeducation, which she is already admitting won’t actually be about Andrew Tate, however concerning the hazard of “limiting narratives round what it means to be a lady, what it means to be a boy.”
Support Greater and Subscribe to view content
This is premium stuff. Subscribe to read the entire article.












