Texas Democrats Are Raging Over GOP Gerrymandering—However They Did It First | The Gateway Pundit

[ad_1] <img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" class=" wp-image-1435304" src="https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/about-capitol-flag.jpg" alt="" width="956" height="718" srcset="https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/about-capitol-flag.jpg 720w, https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/about-capitol-flag-300x225.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 956px) 100vw, 956px"/> Texas Capitol proudly shows each the American and Texas flags, symbolizing the state’s enduring pleasure and unity. (Supply: home.texas.gov)

Democrats in Texas are at present accusing Republicans of utilizing redistricting to achieve a partisan benefit. This accusation, nonetheless, is each disingenuous and traditionally inaccurate.

When Democrats managed the state within the Nineteen Nineties, they engaged in the identical techniques—so aggressively that the U.S. Supreme Court docket finally dominated their districts racially gerrymandered and unconstitutional.

In 1990, Democrat Ann Richards was elected governor of Texas, and the Democratic Occasion managed the state legislature. This management allowed them to redraw congressional districts to take care of their political dominance.

State Senator Eddie Bernice Johnson , a Democrat, chaired the redistricting subcommittee and took cost of drafting the brand new maps. Her express objective was to create new minority-majority districts to favor the Democratic Occasion.

Johnson’s plan resulted in a majority-Hispanic district in Houston and a majority-Black district in Dallas—each aimed toward consolidating long-term Democratic management.

This political maneuvering didn't go unnoticed. The newly drawn districts, which included these represented by Democrats Martin Frost and John Wiley Bryant, grew to become extra homogeneous and much less politically numerous.

Regardless of protests, the Texas Legislature handed Johnson’s plan in 1991. Critics, primarily Republicans, argued that the maps used flawed census knowledge, doubtlessly undercounting minority populations.

But, the U.S. Division of Justice granted preclearance underneath the Voting Rights Act, and the brand new districts have been used within the 1992 elections.

In 1994, Republicans filed a lawsuit, claiming that a number of new districts—notably Districts 18, 29, and 30—have been racially gerrymandered in violation of the Structure.

WATCH: Texas GOP candidate Jay Furman discusses how REDISTRICTING is CURRENTLY IMPACTING his marketing campaign and EXPOSES the CORRUPT techniques utilized by DEMOCRATS.

A federal court docket panel agreed and ordered the state to redraw the congressional districts earlier than the 1996 elections. The case finally reached the Supreme Court docket in Bush v. Vera (1996) , a landmark redistricting case.

The Court docket dominated in favor of the plaintiffs, concluding that Texas Democrats had prioritized racial components over conventional redistricting ideas, akin to compactness and contiguity.

The justices discovered that race had been the predominant consider drawing the district strains, violating the Equal Safety Clause of the Fourteenth Modification.

In consequence, 13 main elections in 1996 have been invalidated and required to be held once more in particular elections.

Regardless of this authorized defeat, Democrats maintained management of Texas’s congressional delegation for the rest of the last decade, regardless of by no means profitable a statewide well-liked vote once more.

In gentle of this historical past, present complaints from Democrats about Republican-led redistricting in Texas are each hypocritical and factually dishonest.

Not too long ago, New York Governor Kathy Hochul, a Democrat, implied that Republicans in Texas and Ohio are “violating the principles” by initiating redistricting exterior the same old ten-year cycle.

At a public occasion in July, she said, “We’re following the principles. We do redistricting each 10 years… but when there are different states violating the principles and making an attempt to present themselves a bonus, all I’ll say is, I’m going to have a look at it carefully.”

Governor Hochul’s assertion disregards a fundamental fact: mid-decade redistricting is legally permissible.

Whereas the Supreme Court docket mandates that states redraw districts each ten years to account for inhabitants adjustments from the decennial census, there isn't any prohibition in opposition to redistricting extra regularly if allowed underneath state legislation.

Texas, like a number of different states, permits redistricting at any time the legislature chooses. Democrats used this flexibility after they have been in energy; now they object to Republicans exercising the identical proper.

It's important to acknowledge that redistricting for purely partisan causes isn't ideally suited governance. Nevertheless, redistricting itself is critical to make sure electoral equity.

With out it, inhabitants imbalances between districts might develop into so excessive that some People could be underrepresented, whereas others would wield disproportionate affect.

The true query isn't whether or not redistricting ought to occur, however underneath what situations and motivations.

In Texas’s case, redistricting could also be justified for causes past partisanship. Beneath the Biden administration, tens of millions of unlawful immigrants have entered the U.S., many settling in Texas.

Former President Biden moved to incorporate non-citizens, together with unlawful immigrants, within the census rely.

This coverage inflated the inhabitants numbers of sure districts—notably these close to the southern border—distorting congressional illustration.

When non-citizens are included within the census, the precept of “one individual, one vote” is undermined. Districts with giant unlawful immigrant populations might have fewer eligible voters however nonetheless wield the identical political energy.

A brand new spherical of redistricting might restore equity by guaranteeing that districts replicate the distribution of eligible voters, not simply complete inhabitants.

Democrats used redistricting to their benefit after they managed Texas. Now Republicans are doing the identical. To fake that just one aspect performs this sport is dishonest.

The true answer lies in structural reforms that apply equally to each events or, on the very least, within the political braveness to cease pretending that one social gathering has the ethical excessive floor when each have used the identical playbook.