We had been fairly underwhelmed by the iPhone 16e when it debuted earlier this yr, principally resulting from its $599 price ticket, which makes it a poor substitute for the budget-oriented iPhone SE. And now that the iPhone 17 has debuted, the 16e makes even much less sense. For $200 extra, you get a bigger and higher display with ProMotion, assist for MagSafe wi-fi charging, a zippier processor, two cameras as an alternative of 1 — and double the storage. Certain, that value distinction hurts a bit, however I feel the iPhone 17 remains to be a greater deal since it isn’t practically as limiting because the iPhone 16e, which ought to have been priced nearer to $500 to tackle one thing just like the Pixel 9a.
Final fall, I argued that the vanilla iPhone 16 was a wise purchase given its revamped CPU and assist for Apple Intelligence, and I feel that continues to be true for the iPhone 17 with its many new options and equivalent value level. Whereas I am positive Apple would love for extra clients to leap to the $999 iPhone Air or $1,099 iPhone 17 Professional, it is nonetheless laborious for lots of people to abdomen spending 4 figures on a smartphone. The ultra-thin Air will seemingly be successful with influencers and the style-obsessed, and energy customers could have a ball with the iPhone 17 Professional’s extra succesful digital camera array. For everybody else, the iPhone 17 stays a strong gadget that may serve you effectively for a few years.
Support Greater and Subscribe to view content
This is premium stuff. Subscribe to read the entire article.
