‘There should be one rulebook’ – One America Information Community

[ad_1] <img decoding="async" width="800" height="533" src="https://www.oann.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/GettyImages-2191540119.webp" alt="A photo taken on January 2, 2025 shows the letters AI for Artificial Intelligence on a laptop screen (R) next to the logo of the Chat AI application on a smartphone screen in Frankfurt am Main, western Germany. (Photo by Kirill KUDRYAVTSEV / AFP) (Photo by KIRILL KUDRYAVTSEV/AFP via Getty Images)" class="wp-image-743302" srcset="https://www.oann.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/GettyImages-2191540119.webp 800w, https://www.oann.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/GettyImages-2191540119-400x267.webp 400w, https://www.oann.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/GettyImages-2191540119-768x512.webp 768w" sizes="(max-width: 800px) 100vw, 800px"/> A photograph taken on January 2, 2025 reveals the letters AI for Synthetic Intelligence on a laptop computer display (R) subsequent to the emblem of the Chat AI software on a smartphone display in Frankfurt am Principal, western Germany. (KIRILL KUDRYAVTSEV/AFP through Getty Pictures)

OAN Workers Blake Wolf9:18 AM – Monday, December 8, 2025

President Donald Trump introduced plans to signal an govt order aimed toward regulating synthetic intelligence on the federal degree, arguing that the US will solely win the AI race if corporations can work underneath “one rulebook.”

In a Monday Reality Social put up, President Trump answered longstanding questions on the way forward for AI regulation, looking for to keep away from totally different regulation requirements inside all 50 states, which he argues would hinder development.

“There should be solely One Rulebook if we're going to proceed to guide in AI. We're beating ALL COUNTRIES at this level within the race, however that received’t final lengthy if we're going to have 50 States, lots of them unhealthy actors, concerned in RULES and the APPROVAL PROCESS,” Trump wrote.

“THERE CAN BE NO DOUBT ABOUT THIS! AI WILL BE DESTROYED IN ITS INFANCY! I shall be doing a ONE RULE Govt Order this week. You'll be able to’t anticipate an organization to get 50 Approvals each time they need to do one thing. THAT WILL NEVER WORK!” he added.

🚨 BREAKING: President Trump pronounces ONE federal normal govt order for all 50 states in AI

“There should be solely One Rulebook if we're going to proceed to guide in AI. We're beating ALL COUNTRIES at this level within the race, however that received’t final lengthy if we're going to… pic.twitter.com/yef7qS3V5E

Commercial

— Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) December 8, 2025

Critics argue {that a} uniform federal AI rulebook might weaken accountability by lowering each general oversight and the specialised state-level laws wanted to handle native issues.

In Could, Tennessee Lawyer Basic Jonathan Skrmetti led a bipartisan push, together with Colorado Lawyer Basic Phil Weiser, New Hampshire Lawyer Basic John Formella, and Vermont Lawyer Basic Charity Clark, in opposing a federal ban on state regulation of AI.

“The mixed efforts of the states and the federal authorities have been, at finest, barely sufficient to guard customers from Massive Tech,” Skrmetti said on the time.

“AI has unimaginable potential however amplifies each danger we’ve seen from Massive Tech and creates new dangers we don’t absolutely perceive. Eliminating state oversight by way of this reconciliation modification ensures Individuals will undergo repeated violations of their privateness, shopper safety, and antitrust legal guidelines,” he continued.

“AI guarantees to revolutionize America’s economic system, spur achievement and innovation, and enhance lives throughout the nation. Nonetheless, the rise of such know-how presents actual, rapid risks starting from express materials and election interference to deception, exploitation, and harassment towards customers. Within the absence of federal management, state legislatures and attorneys normal have continued to be on the forefront of making certain AI just isn't abused and that customers are protected.”

Final month, Florida Governor Ron DeSantis (R-Fla.) labeled unified AI regulation in Washington, “federal authorities overreach.”

“Stripping states of jurisdiction to control AI is a subsidy to Massive Tech and can stop states from defending towards on-line censorship of political speech, predatory purposes that focus on kids, violations of mental property rights and information middle intrusions on energy/water sources,” DeSantis added.

Alternatively, proponents of a unified federal regulation of AI argue {that a} patchwork of disjointed state-level regulation would hinder development, forcing corporations to stick to totally different requirements in each state and probably decreasing the US’ standing within the AI race with China.

“There are some states that need to regulate these corporations inside an inch of their lives, and once they make a misstep, nice the heck out of them,” said Nationwide Financial Council Director Kevin Hassett on Monday. “This govt order that [Trump] promised to return out goes to make it clear that there’s one algorithm for AI corporations within the U.S.”

Hassett added that President Trump reviewed “one thing near a closing” draft of the AI govt order this previous weekend.

In January, President Trump introduced a $500 billion funding in synthetic intelligence, supported by OpenAI, SoftBank, and Oracle, to launch a brand new firm referred to as Stargate, designed to develop “the bodily and digital infrastructure to energy the subsequent technology of developments in AI.”