Why a whisper community app like Tea isn’t your pal

[ad_1] It sounds just like the plot of a Black Mirror episode. Single, straight ladies log right into a courting app, however to not meet males. As a substitute, they will display native guys, utilizing pictures and user-reported “crimson flags.” The app is designed to make the expertise of discovering a companion much less dangerous, but it surely rapidly culminates in catastrophe.

That is already the trajectory of the Tea app, which skilled a current surge in recognition. It reached No. 1 on the Prime Free Apps chart late final month within the App Retailer and stays within the prime 10. The app at present boasts over 6 million customers, per its website . Completely designed for ladies, the “courting security device” is a cross between security community Citizen and overview hub Yelp, permitting customers to put up nameless evaluations of males, reverse image-search their pictures, and run background checks. A few of these options are paywalled, together with limitless searches for $15 a month. Its founder, Sean Cook dinner, a former Salesforce product supervisor, created the app in 2023 after witnessing his mom’s “terrifying expertise with on-line courting,” from being catfished to unknowingly assembly males with prison data.

Predictably, a overview app for human beings has not been universally fashionable, drawing criticism from each males who feared having their data posted on-line and experts who recognized critical privateness and defamation issues, each out and in of the app.

Whereas Tea prohibits screenshots, TikTok customers have managed to post their screens whereas scrolling via the app. Males, whether or not via word-of-mouth or accessing the app themselves, have additionally been capable of see and respond to their evaluations. Along with gathering knowledge to doubtlessly share with advertisers, Tea’s privateness coverage states that the corporate might share customers’ data to “reply to lawful requests and authorized processes.” As reporter Amanda Hoover wrote for Business Insider , this caveat “might open ladies who assume they’re posting in good religion to defamation fits by disgruntled males whose reputations endure by what has been posted about them, even when it’s correct.” It was nearly too predictable when Tea reported a cyberattack on July 25 that uncovered customers’ private data, direct messages, and selfies. Consequently, its messaging operate has been suspended .

In the end, the “identify and disgrace” premise of the app has drawn essentially the most controversy on-line, together with some bad-faith takes. It’s the form of panic and debate that occurred when the “Shitty Media Men” spreadsheet leaked in 2017 and following the launch of the now-shuttered dating app Lulu in 2014, which crowdsourced details about males in an analogous means as Tea.

Whereas there are, as Cook dinner’s causes for creating the app suggest, critical and justifiable reasons why ladies who date males on-line would possibly search to guard themself by studying extra in regards to the guys they meet, arguably, an app like Tea is problematic. The most important situation is {that a} commercially obtainable app misunderstands the worth, in addition to the bounds, of whisper networks in protecting ladies secure. Whereas these sources have confirmed to be crucial in workplaces and the broader social world, they turn out to be much more sophisticated and misused as soon as they’re commodified.

The courting world is tough, in methods huge and small

It’s straightforward to learn Tea as a cynical try to capitalize on the distraught and dystopian panorama of courting proper now.

“Women and men are approaching courting assuming that different individuals are out to mislead them,” relationship skilled Rachel Vanderbilt says. “This contains what they’re in search of in a relationship, what their values are, or whether or not they're seeing different folks. An app like this actually feeds into insecurities and distrust.”

On the similar time, surveillance and casual snitching have turn out to be normalized within the technique of discovering (or possibly simply eliminating) a possible companion. Individuals usually put up their negative or simply awkward communications on courting apps like Hinge for his or her followers to dissect. A big swath of storytime movies on TikTok are devoted to customers discussing bad dating experiences , typically revealing the wrongdoer’s identify and turning them into notorious figures .

A dishy posture is frequent on this realm, and Tea made the selection to capitalize on that by having a reputation that’s queer slang for gossip. As one TikTok person pointed out , the truth that the courting security app, which donates a portion of its income to the Nationwide Home Abuse Hotline, makes use of such salacious advertising feels a bit odd and inconsistent. It implies a stage of frivolousness. Moreover, a picture on Tea’s web site exhibits one girl whispering to a different girl, who has a shocked — not precisely distressed — expression on her face.

Equally, the app’s use of “crimson flags” to indicate behaviors that will compromise a lady’s security has been equally problematic, given how loosely the time period is used on-line. A crimson flag might imply something from stalking conduct, emotional abuse and manipulation, and bodily hazard to a person not texting again by a sure time. How, precisely, ought to customers determine what sort of conduct warrants itemizing? How expansive ought to a crimson flag be? Isn’t it an issue if it might probably embody every thing from critical bodily abuse to common, human errors?

Issues turn out to be much more unreliable with the app’s prison background checks. Specialists have traditionally criticized these kind of screenings on courting apps, like Tinder, explaining that gendered violence is usually unreported. Consequently, abusers aren’t usually interacting with the prison justice system. App customers are shopping for into an thought of safety that could be little greater than a mirage.

The issue with promoting a whisper community

In some ways, Tea is particularly a poorly made product. Nonetheless, the broader failure of apps of its sort, regardless of the demand, demonstrates how tackling social points like gendered violence could be antithetical to the targets and methods of shopper capitalism.

An organization that “gender washes,” or leverages feminism for advertising, would possibly nicely maintain equality as a real aim, says Natasha Mulvihill, an affiliate professor of criminology on the College of Bristol. However, she explains, “revenue and advertising logics can imply these goals turn out to be distorted, contradictory, and doubtlessly dangerous.”

The distortion right here is apparent within the advertising: to unfold broadly and acquire customers, the app has to current a critical situation as enjoyable, mild, gameable — an analogous expertise as swiping via Tinder, for instance. Tea just isn't alone on this; Lulu shared lots of the similar issues. Kicky advertising and unfastened, user-driven definitions of dangerous conduct make the app extra interesting, whilst they obscure the gravity of the central concern.

Additionally they take away the context and circumstances that beget whisper networks within the first place. A 2023 study , surveying ladies between the ages of 18 and 64, discovered that whisper networks helped “members make sense of their experiences and discover assist” in workplaces the place “sexual harassment just isn't taken severely, and reporting sexual harassment is dangerous.” On an app utilized by tens of millions of strangers, the solidarity you may need with a colleague coping with the identical creepy boss, and even the inherent belief you’d have with a pal warning you a few sketchy man, is lacking. The one factor that unites the customers is their heterosexual womanhood, leaving a lot of house for various experiences, views, and intentions.

<img alt="Two young women looking at cellphone and smiling." data-chromatic="ignore" loading="lazy" decoding="async" data-nimg="fill" class="mvmjsc0" style="position:absolute;height:100%;width:100%;left:0;top:0;right:0;bottom:0;color:transparent;background-size:cover;background-position:50% 50%;background-repeat:no-repeat;background-image:url("data:image/svg+xml;charset=utf-8,%3Csvg xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg' %3E%3Cfilter id='b' color-interpolation-filters='sRGB'%3E%3CfeGaussianBlur stdDeviation='20'/%3E%3CfeColorMatrix values='1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 100 -1' result='s'/%3E%3CfeFlood x='0' y='0' width='100%25' height='100%25'/%3E%3CfeComposite operator='out' in='s'/%3E%3CfeComposite in2='SourceGraphic'/%3E%3CfeGaussianBlur stdDeviation='20'/%3E%3C/filter%3E%3Cimage width='100%25' height='100%25' x='0' y='0' preserveAspectRatio='none' style='filter: url(%23b);' href=''/%3E%3C/svg%3E")" sizes="(max-width: 639px) 100vw, (max-width: 1023px) 50vw, 700px" srcset="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2025/08/GettyImages-1574854771.jpg?quality=90&strip=all&crop=0%2C0%2C100%2C100&w=256 256w, https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2025/08/GettyImages-1574854771.jpg?quality=90&strip=all&crop=0%2C0%2C100%2C100&w=376 376w, https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2025/08/GettyImages-1574854771.jpg?quality=90&strip=all&crop=0%2C0%2C100%2C100&w=384 384w, https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2025/08/GettyImages-1574854771.jpg?quality=90&strip=all&crop=0%2C0%2C100%2C100&w=415 415w, https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2025/08/GettyImages-1574854771.jpg?quality=90&strip=all&crop=0%2C0%2C100%2C100&w=480 480w, https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2025/08/GettyImages-1574854771.jpg?quality=90&strip=all&crop=0%2C0%2C100%2C100&w=540 540w, https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2025/08/GettyImages-1574854771.jpg?quality=90&strip=all&crop=0%2C0%2C100%2C100&w=640 640w, https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2025/08/GettyImages-1574854771.jpg?quality=90&strip=all&crop=0%2C0%2C100%2C100&w=750 750w, https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2025/08/GettyImages-1574854771.jpg?quality=90&strip=all&crop=0%2C0%2C100%2C100&w=828 828w, https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2025/08/GettyImages-1574854771.jpg?quality=90&strip=all&crop=0%2C0%2C100%2C100&w=1080 1080w, https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2025/08/GettyImages-1574854771.jpg?quality=90&strip=all&crop=0%2C0%2C100%2C100&w=1200 1200w, https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2025/08/GettyImages-1574854771.jpg?quality=90&strip=all&crop=0%2C0%2C100%2C100&w=1440 1440w, https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2025/08/GettyImages-1574854771.jpg?quality=90&strip=all&crop=0%2C0%2C100%2C100&w=1920 1920w, https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2025/08/GettyImages-1574854771.jpg?quality=90&strip=all&crop=0%2C0%2C100%2C100&w=2048 2048w, https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2025/08/GettyImages-1574854771.jpg?quality=90&strip=all&crop=0%2C0%2C100%2C100&w=2400 2400w" src="https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2025/08/GettyImages-1574854771.jpg?quality=90&strip=all&crop=0%2C0%2C100%2C100&w=2400"/> Catherine Falls Business/Getty Photographs

“There isn't a assure that the data you might be receiving is nice data or is truthful,” Vanderbilt says. “Are you getting real recommendation from somebody who has good intentions, or are you getting vindictive recommendation from somebody who has been damage earlier than?”

The premise appears partly primarily based on a notion that’s been steadily disputed in a post-girlboss culture — that ladies, just by advantage of being ladies, are all the time searching for one another’s greatest pursuits.

There are even deeper contradictions, too: Whereas Tea intends to foster group amongst ladies, it additionally implies that their publicity to harmful males is one thing they will personally handle.

Mulvihill says Tea purports a “neoliberal” thought of girls’s security as an “particular person situation of danger administration,” versus a “social and public coverage situation that everybody should be engaged in.”

“On the floor, this seems to be to be creating ‘group’ and ‘security in numbers,’ however paradoxically, danger administration approaches can result in responsibilizing particular person ladies for managing males’s violence,” she says. “If they're harmed, then they may really feel they ‘must have recognized higher’ or ‘must have managed the danger higher.’”

Moreover, information just isn't all the time a dependable protection in opposition to violence or different dangerous conduct. Mulvihill relates this situation again to “crimson flags” discourse on-line in her 2025 examine known as “ The New Experts of Online Dating: Feminism, Advice, and Harm ” on Instagram, co-authored with Joanna Giant: “efforts at consciousness-raising and training are crucial, however it is crucial additionally to acknowledge that ‘figuring out’ just isn't sufficient.”

These overarching issues — that data, even when it’s correct and reliable, can doubtless by no means be full, and worse, that even excellent information nonetheless will not be sufficient energy — are inherent to all whisper networks. It’s simply that rather more sophisticated when there’s an organization, not your colleague, fostering the murmurs.

Inevitably, it’s ladies who face repercussions for wanting to interact with these sources, whether or not it’s apps like Tea or spreadsheets about problematic males, after they backfire. Already, disgruntled males on-line have countered the Tea app with suggestions for apps that will ridicule and humiliate ladies. Law firms are issuing steerage on how males who've been posted about on the app can legally retaliate.

If the Tea app achieved something, it confirmed that ladies’s experiences with misogyny can’t be solved with a shopper product, and sisterhood can’t be offered at scale. If ladies might shield themselves by scrolling their telephones, wouldn’t we've found it already?